Dr Kwabena Adjei |
Published on May 7th, 2013
By Ekow Mensah
An intense battle for
the leadership of the National Democratic Congress(NDC) has already began with
most contestants shying away from making public declarations.
Form all indications
incumbent Dr Kwabena Adjei is interested
in retaining his position and would file his papers as soon as
campaigning begins.
One favorite
candidate is Samuel Ofosu Ampofo who was Minister of Local Government in the
Mills administration.
He has publicly said that he has no interest
in becoming the National Chairman of the NDC but some cadres say that he will
be the man to beat at the NDC congress.
Mr Ofosu Ampoful has
been the National Organizer of the NDC and was one of the leading spokespersons
of the party between 2001 and 2008 when the party wallowed in opposition.
He contested parliamentary elections in the
2012 general election and lost by a slim margin.
It is obvious that he
expected to be appointed a Minister in the Mahama administration because when that didn’t
happen he told Radio Gold that “I am disappointed but not angry”
Many in the party see
him as an effective organizer and one of
the remnants of the cadre core groomed in the middle of the 1980s for future
leadership.
Another name which is
making the rounds is Kofi Portuphy, a founding member of the June 4
Movement and who is currently National
Vice Chairman of the Party.
Portophy joined
others like Sakuna Agambilla, Yaya Yen, Zaya Yeebo, Kwasi Adu and Gariba to
found the June 4 Movement in the latter part of 1979.
Samuel Ofosu Ampofo |
Since then Portuphy
has remained in the ranks of what was described as the 31st December
Revolution.
He has never been
appointed as a Minister and has kept himself in the shadows of mainstream
government dealings as the boss of the National Mobilization Programme.
He is generally
reputed to be left leaning.
Sources in the NDC
say that General Secretary, Asiedu Nketia will most likely be retained.
He is said to be unbeatable with his
popularity soaring both within and outside the party.
Afriyie Ankrah is
quoted as saying that he would only be interested in contesting for the
position of General Secretary if Asiedu Nketia steps down.
There are unconfirmed
reports that current Deputy General Secretary, Kofi Adams may throw his hat in.
Kofi Adams is the
special Assistant to the founder of the
party and former President Jerry John Rawlings.
He has so far
maintained a dignified silence over the speculation about his candidature.
Although he is seen
in some circles as a formidable candidate because of the apparent
rapprochement between President Mahama
and the founder of the party, the popularity of the incumbent may be difficult
to overcome.
Editorial
COMMENDATION
Vice President Paa
Kwesi Amissah- Arthur deserves commendation for his personal and timely
intervention following the fire outbreak at the Kantamanto market in Accra.
The Vice President
has ordered the national relief agency to provide immediate assistance to the affected traders.
In addition he has
asked the Ministry of Finance and financial institutions to move in quickly and
provide much needed assistance to the affected traders.
The Insight notes
that the Vice President was on the scene of the disaster within two hours of
its occurrence and spent considerable time with the victims.
Whiles commending the
Vice President, we wish to make the
point that measures need to be taken immediately to avoid such occurrences in the future.
Indeed one of the reasons why the fire could
not be contained was that there were no access roads to the market.
The time has come for
the relevant authorities to pay serious attention to the building of modern
markets with access roads and other facilities for disaster management.
The building of a modern market at Kantamanto
and other places in the country is an imperative.
We salute Vice
President Paa Kwesi Amissah Arthur for his intervention.
THE PRICE OF WRONG DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
By
Peter Kofi Amponsah
This paper was written in June 2008 in reaction to the claim
by the NPP government that it has laid a solid foundation for economic
transformation of this country. Then, on Ghanaweb of 8th December
2010, the former President, Mr J.A Kuffuor was reported to have said that his
government was the best since independence.
However, the debate that this article was originally
intended to generate has now been attenuated by the recently launched ICT
programme by Rlg Communication, known as “Hope City”. This programme appeared
to have answered most of the concerns raised in the paper and has therefore
gladdened my heart for now. The following is the original paper which was
written in June 2008.
It is senseless, indeed absurd, to try to solve scientific
problems by a majority vote. Scientific problems can only be solved by
scientific methods, this fact is incontestable. The humiliating tragedy of our
present position as peddlers of primary raw materials on the world market in
exchange for manufactured goods after fifty-one years of independence is
totally unacceptable, and therefore constitutes a spectacular proof of the
futility of attempts to solve scientific problems by a majority vote. However,
mistakes can be instructive if they are discovered in time and if their causes
are analyzed carefully.
For some time now, governments of Ghana have been operating
with a wrong concept of development. This development policy began around 1978
after General Kutu Acheampong was ousted from power, and continued to this day.
It involved the opening up of the
country for foreign investment in the extractive industries without the
corresponding development of the country’s scientific and technological
infrastructure that would enable us to
transform such resources into finished products for worldwide
distribution.
KNOWLEDGE
BASED ECONOMY
It remains impossible to become a player in the knowledge
based global economy of the twenty-first century with this kind of thoughtless
misuse of the country’s natural resources. I am very sorry that I have to use
this kind of expression which clearly demonstrates my frustration about the
situation in this country of our birth. It is an unfortunate necessity. That
seems to be the only way by which the gravity and the inevitable catastrophic
consequences which this situation entails can be brought home to our policy
makers.
Another area of grave concern is the so-called Information and Communication Technology
(ICT) programme. Our present approach to this programme has made us just a
market and dumping ground for foreign computer manufacturers.
We should have taken major steps by now in accelerating the
development of electronic and microelectronic industries which will provide the
real technological base for any ICT programme. At the moment, no government
agency is interested in the knowledge of building the computers that are used
in the Information and Communication Technology training programme. The
development of electronic and micro-electronic industries which are the key to
any modern industrial development are not parts of our areas of interest.
A BIG
JOKE
What is happening in our country now is a big joke and a
complete waste of time. Even, General Kutu Acheampong, whose administration has
been accused of economic crimes of various description, recognized the need for
a state- of- the- art telecommunication infrastructure, and took the necessary
steps to build the Earth Satellite Station some thirty years ago.
DEVELOPMENT
OF MICROELECTRONIC INDUSTRY
Not only that, but also a plan was well advanced to
transform the Electronic Division of
GIHOC, at Tema, known as Akasanoma, into a full scale Electronic Industry, and
to begin a very serious development of Integrated Circuits. The term integrated
circuit (IC) implies a union of components which form a structurally integral
device, designed to perform more complex
functions than those assigned to
isolated components.
The inseparably associated and electrically interconnected
components that make up an IC are called integrated ( circuit) elements. They
show certain features which distinguish them from conventional transistors or
resistors fabricated as structurally individual elements and interconnected by
soldering to form a circuit.
I said “even General Kutu Acheampong”, because there was a
time in the history of this country when it was almost treasonable to say
anything good about him. In addition,
there was also a stigma attached to people who were said to have either worked
with him or have been closely associated with him. People now, with some great
reluctance, accept and praise his agricultural programme during the early years
of his administration, known as the Operation Feed Yourself programme, but for
reasons still to be discovered, the development of high technology which is the
most important programme that would have ensured the country’s economic might and viability, which he
was pursuing under “lock and key” have
never been mentioned by anybody anywhere to this day, not even by our Intelligence Services Chiefs. Does this
mean that they too did not notice what was going on? Whatever the
reason, we must also realize that economic power does not come by itself. It is
now contingent upon technological power, and that he who controls technology,
also controls economic power.
What I want to put across is that the Operation Feed
Yourself programme was just one aspect of a huge and comprehensive programme
that was meant to prepare the entire country for automation. Because facts
available to us clearly indicated that
automatization of industry was and
is still the call of the day. Experts single out two main trends in
machine building – creation of automatic lines, including rotor-based ones, and
flexible automated processes ( FAPs). The latter are a response to the growing
worldwide tendency to rapidly change the type of production. Serviceable
equipment should be readily re-adjustable, in other words the automated process
must acquire flexibility. But this aspect of the programme did not register and
has still not registered on the radar screen of most of our so-called economic
experts.
Acheampong had an unprecedented opportunity to make this
country great and prosperous once again. At the same time, the problems he
faced were unprecedented in their complexity. The top of these problems was the
question of legitimacy, which made it possible for his political opponents led
by the elitist organizations such as the Professional Bodies Association and
others to try to organize parts of the country’s population against his
government. However, when it comes to putting Ghana on the high road of
advanced technology after Kwame Nkrumah, it was clearly General Kutu
Acheampong. No other leader of this country could come any closer. He was the
only leader since 1966 who was prepared to bring Kwame Nkrumah’s
industrialization programme to the highest level attained by modern science and
technology.
It was also the period during which Japan caught Europe and
America asleep and drove past them in key areas of high technology. The
contemptuous attitude of a large section of the intellectual elite in the
country towards General Acheampong in particular greatly helped to keep public
attention away from what we were doing. Apart from Mr. Kwasi Amoako-Atta, who
was clearly visible, those operating on the high technology aspect of the
programme were completely hidden from the public.
Acheampong’s programme, if it were not abandoned after his
overthrow in 1978, could have taken Ghana into space on the 50th
anniversary of its independence.
Acheampong’s main aim was to use automation and other
branches of high technology to pull the country from poverty onto a high level
of economic prosperity before the world would wake up to know what was
happening in Ghana.
INDIA
India in 1982, drew up a 10-year plan for the development of
its micro-electronic industry, with emphasis on the training of competent
personnel and the study and development of large scale integrated circuits. By
1992, that was exactly ten years after the programme started, it become a space
power. Today, India is a telecommunication superpower. It has also become a
knowledge superpower, which has managed to skip the intermediate step of
industrial development that has preceded other nations’ march into the
Information Age.
Large scale
integrated circuits are used for developing new generations of computers and
are based on crystals artificially grown in definite conditions; physical
instruments capable of withstanding the influence of aggressive environments,
penetrating radiation, high temperatures and pressures, which include
heat-proof single crystals; The rapid development of laser technology, non-linear optics and other
modern lines in science and technology was made possible by the growth of large
crystals with remarkable optical properties.
Since microelectronics continues to advance with huge
strides, many specialists now recognize that keeping up to date is becoming
more and more difficult. To make the best of the integrated circuits,
development engineers must possess the latest knowledge and master new
techniques of designing with ICs.
Microelectronics as a logical extension of electronics is
distinguished for organic unity of its physical, technological, and circuitry
aspects. For this reason, it is hardly possible to expect creative development
of integrated circuits relying, for example, only on the effort of “classical”
engineers concerned with designing individual semiconductor devices but not
having the background in micro-circuitry.
Also, the effort of “classical” circuit design engineers
alone is not enough for further advancement. An engineer engaged in microelectronics
must equally well know the basics of microelectronic physics, technology, and
micro-circuitry. Only with this background can he specialize in any branch of
microelectronics.
If some three decades ago, we had already built an Earth
Satellite Station, and were taking the necessary steps to establish a full
scale microelectronic industry, and had continued with this programme, Ghana
would certainly have been a different country by now. Here, I am not even referring to Nkrumah’s period, but
Acheampong’s period, because all what I mentioned happened during Acheampong’s period.
THE
LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT
At that time we were
far ahead in the level of scientific and technological development of some of
the countries which are now referred to as the four tiger club of Asia. By
1965, Ghana was more developed scientifically and technologically than some of
the countries in the far East which have now attained the status of economic
tigers.
According to Professor Peter F. Druker of Claremont Graduate
School in the USA, in 1958 when the Korean conflict ended, the Republic of
Korea was even more devastated than Japan had been in 1945. The country had no
industry at all and almost no trained and educated people. Hong Kong until the
160s was a trading port without industries. Singapore was little more than a
British naval base. And Taiwan had little except a few plantation that supplied
the country’s colonial masters, the Japanese with high sugars. See Economic
impact: Global challenges of the 1990s 1990/ 1 page 74.
Acheampong regarded
the development of high technology as the most important step to ensure the
country’s economic might and viability, but managed to make his opponents look
elsewhere. The fact that they seriously underrated his intellectual ability made
it possible for him to keep his real development aim from the light of day.
Because nobody really credited him with such intentions and capabilities.
The role of electronics in the development of modern science
and technology can scarcely be overestimated. Electronics is by right
considered a catalyst of scientific and technical progress. A country that
imports most of its electronic equipment is in danger of ceasing to be part of
modern civilization.
Progress in electronics has also been a big help to cybernetics
– the science and technology concerned with the study of control and
information flows in artificial and natural systems, and has
also served as a basis of
high-speed electronic computers.
INTEREST
IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Acheampong was deeply
interested in the development of high technology, but certainly not to the
level of Nkrumah. He also wanted to keep the development of that programme from
the light of day. At a meeting in his
office at the Ministry of Defence with Dr E. M. Boye and two other electronic
engineers, we clearly saw even at that time,
that information technology had already become an indispensable
infrastructure to modern industrial countries, and that any nation showing
indifference to the study and development of new technology was only
relinquishing its right to become a modern industrial power.
Dr Boye was a top class Electronic Engineer and the General
Manager of the Electronic Division of GIHOC. He was very much committed to
helping to put the country on the electronic map of the world, and for this he
paid a heavy price. The conspiracy to keep Ghana away from the high road of
advanced technology was still very strong, and with the exit of General
Acheampong from power, he no longer had the necessary protection and support
for that kind of undertaking. In fact,
his capabilities were brought to our attention after he began to have problems
with the Board of Akasanoma, a company of which he was the General Manager.
General Acheampong did not order Dr Boye’s reinstatement as
the General Manager of Akasanma, because he thought such a move would have
exposed him and attracted public attention to the purpose for which he was
going to use him as the main pillar for the development of electronic industry
in Ghana, when the programme itself was supposed to be kept from the light of
day.
While the industrial dispute at Akasanoma continued, two
main problems requiring urgent and practical solutions engaged the attention of
General Acheampong at that time. The first was the persistent inability of
Firestone Company, engaged in vehicles tyres production to satisfy the local
market, and the second was how to be self-sufficient in sugar production in
Ghana, having already convinced ourselves of our ability to produce enough rice
to feed the whole population of the country.
CAPTAIN
AKUFFO
This is where I will always remember the late Captain
Akuffo, one of the most outstanding nationalists and patriots I ever came
across in the Ghana Armed Forces. Captain Akuffo was one of very few people who
knew of the real development programme which for certain reasons was not put on
paper. The plan involving the development of high technology was not put on
paper. He was the Comptroller of Government Houses at the State Protocol Office
during the early years of the NRC rule. He was later seconded to the Firestone
factory at Bonsaso in the Western Region.
ACHEAMPONG’S
FRUSTRATION
When he heard about General Acheampong’s frustration on the vehicles tyres supply situation and
what he was planning to do about it, he sent for me to visit him at the
factory. I spent two days at their guest house during which I had sufficient
briefing on the production level, production capacity of the factory itself,
and what could be done to meet the whole country’s requirement.
But that was not the end of the story. I was also taken to
the factory of the Ghana Rubber Estate to meet the General Manager, who was
in-charge of the place. He was a
Hungarian American engineer who could best be described as a walking encyclopeadia
on the industrial uses of natural rubber.
The first thing I
learnt from him was that natural rubber is a strategic raw material. It is also
a stock for war, and that is why Japan had to capture Malaysia first at the
very beginning of the Second World War, and the Russians who do not have the
geographical possibility of producing it, were the first to produce artificial
crude rubber in 1926, because it is grown only in the tropical rain forest.
The major commercial source of natural rubber latex is
the Para rubber tree. Hevea brasiliensis
(Euphorbiaceae). Other plants containing latex include figs ( Ficus elastica )
castilla, euphorbia. Germany attempted to use such sources during the Second
World War when it was cut off from rubber supplies. These attempts were later
supplanted by the development of synthetic rubber.
After listening to him for two solid hours, I and Captain
Akuffo agreed that he would be of immense use to the country in our programme
and therefore should be invited to meet the Head of State in Accra. But he told
us that his employers would put him on board the next available plane if they
ever got to know about this plan.
So, It was decided that he and his family should come down
to Accra to spend a weekend at the Firestone Guest House near the Special
Branch Headquarters, so that on Monday morning
before their departure for the Western Region, he would be picked up to
the Ministry of Defence Office of the
Head of State, and that was exactly what we deed. So here he was sort of, smuggled
to meet the Head of State, and after one full hour meeting, General Acheampong
was so impressed that he requested that the man be brought back another day for
further discussion.
THE SUGAR PRODUCTION
Now on the sugar production, his plan to bring down Cuban
technical and agricultural experts to help in modernizing the two sugar
factories at Asutuare and Komenda, and to guarantee their raw material supply,
as a part of the Operation Feed Your Industries programme, leaked out before it
could be implemented. This led to a rumor
to the effect that he was bringing down Cuban soldiers to take over the
Police Armored Unit in order to help him perpetuate his rule. I was
shocked when I head this, because to the
best of my knowledge of him, he was never the type of person who would use
foreign troops for his protection, and that could be one of the reasons why he
remained at the Arakan Baracks throughout the period he was in power. It
is not clear whether this was one of the
real reasons for his overthrow, and why the Police Armored Unit became a target
of the SMC 2, after his overthrow.
TRAINING
OF TALENTS
Some few years later, that was in the beginning of the
1980s, it was discovered that as
knowledge was increasingly becoming a key factor in a country’s productivity,
competitiveness and economic results, various countries had already begun to
vastly boost their investment in their population’s intellectual development,
putting the training of new talent high on the agenda as a measure to meet what
was then known as a “serious challenge”.
It was at that time that South Korea saw the need to close
her computer and the entire electronic industry to foreign investment and began
to develop her own home grown Research
and Development.
This shows that there is always a considerable degree of
secrecy around the development of any new technology by every country in the
world. For example, scientists had been working on the Atomic Bomb for three
years by 1945. Almost nobody else, except the president of the United States of
America, knew about this work. The secret effort to build a nuclear weapon was
called the Manhattan Project. Ghana now
needs a Manhattan Project, not for development of nuclear weapon. But for a
major scientific and technological breakthrough.
THE
GENESIS
With several vehicles assembly plants in the country, and
also in consideration of the fact that the Operation Feed Yoursef programme was
going to move into its second stage to be known as Operation Feed Your
Industries, it became clear that proper industrial development could not take
place without metals.
Upon the instruction of General Acheampong, I invited the
following distinguished personalities some of whom are still alive, to a
meeting to discuss the possibility of providing the country with iron and steel
industry. They were: Dr Kofi Sam, General Manager of Tema Steel Works, Mr H.N.
O. Kwao, Mechanical Engineer and Head of Research at the Bank of Ghana. Dr Ivan
Addae-Mensah of the University of Ghana, and Dr Owusu Bempah of the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission.
THE
NEED FOR A CHEMICAL INDUSTRY
We were also to examine the possibility of establishing a
chemical industry in the country, to provide the material base for the
development of chemical science in Ghana.
Chemistry plays an exceedingly important role in modern life, especially
in man’s industrial activities. It is difficult to find a branch of industry
not connected with the use of chemistry. To be able to chemically process
natural materials, we must know the general laws of transformation of
substances, and it is exactly chemistry that gives us this knowledge.
The development of the chemical industry is one of the most
important conditions for technical progress. The use of chemical materials
makes it possible to increase the quantity of products manufactured and improve
their quality.
Our meeting place was the OAU Lounge at the Airport.
The result of this meeting was the invitation and the
appointment of Dr R.P.Baffour to develop the Integrated Iron and Steel Industry
at Oppon Manse in the Western Region.
A NATIONAL THINK TANK
The more permanent think tank meeting place was being
prepared at the Peduase Lodge, completely outside public view. Dr Boye, the
then General Manager of the Electronic Division of GIHOC, was given the
responsibility to compile the list of members. According to the directive, the
list should also include a few military officers with technical background. I
saw Brigadier Mensah-Brown’s name on the list and was later told that he and Dr
Boye were both Lecturers at the Engineering Faculty at the Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology. I also saw the name of Professor Phillips
of the University of Ghana Medical School, and a few others.
The team was to meet for the whole day on every Saturday,
starting from the first Saturday of August 1978. They were to be fed at the
place and also to be provided with coupons for fuel, but no money was to be
paid to them. This was because almost all the people on the list were already
working in the various areas of the Public Service who saw their invitation by
the Head of State to be part of a nucleus of a
National Strategic Industrial
Planning Body or a Think Tank as an honour.
POWER
SUPPLY TO THE IRON AND STEEL PROJECT.
When it became known that the VRA would not be able to
supply the 130MW of power required by the Integrated Iron and Steel Project,
General Acheampong immediately called for a systemstic implementation of the
entire electrification programme of Dr
Kwame Nkrumah. That programme talked of electrification of the whole country.
He said: “ without abundant electric power, large scale industrialization such
as we envisaged was impossible”.
Electric power supply is a decisive factor in
the development of any modern economy. It is one of the principal indices of
economic development of a country and reflects the total state of its
productive forces. Without power supply it will be impossible to transform the
enormous natural resources of the country by modern technology for world wide
distribution.
For this reason, it was planned to build five hydroelectric
power stations at Akosombo, Bui, Kpong and one each on the Ankobra and the Tano
rivers. There was also a future plan to build at least one nuclear power and
one thermal power stations.
Under this electrification programme, it was clearly
understood that modern economic development programme based on the latest
scientific and technological achievements requires very high electric power
station reliability, because interruption in power supply not only affects the
industries it serves, but also impaires
the efficiency of the station itself.
To solve this problem, these separate stations were to be
integrated into power systems to ensure continued supply and reduce the
generating capacity reserve per unit. Integration of separate systems
represents a higher stage in scientific and technological development in power
engineering. Because such integration would ensure rational distribution of
loads and the switching of surplus capacity into free channels which makes it
possible at any moment to resist the elemental force of electric flooding.
THE
JAPANESE’ METHOD OF PRODUCTION
Acheampong was keenly interested in the Japanese method of
development, and how that country was running her industries. Information
available to us at that time so far indicated that, in 1970 Japan had 6000
electronic computers, Britain had 5000, West Germany had 6500, and the USA had
70,000. But the effectiveness of the way they were employed was not determined
solely by their number or quality. Job organization was also very important.
Its job organization was based on a clear knowledge of how to unite computers
in a system of automation and to concentrate their intellectual power on the most important front of the
economy.
The speed and memory capacity of modern electronic computers
have brought qualitative changes in the intellectual work and extended the
creative power of man. Computers completely transformed Japanese industry and
transport. They now have a universal impact on both production and management.
So that here, Japan made it not through primitive manual
labour, but through automation. It employed the latest and the most advanced
methods of production. In Japanese manufacturing industry at that time, for
example, plant was renovated at a rate of 20% per annum, so that its average
age was not high, somewhere around five or six years. Such a forced
rejuvenation of the stock of machines according to the report was naturally not cheap, but production
repaid the generosity a hundred fold.
Armed with this information, general Acheampong demanded
and obtained from the Ministry of
Industry, the list of the state owned manufacturing industries as well as their
upgrading or modernization programme from their respective managements. He had
already begun to take the necessary major steps to prepare the country for
automation.
DEVELOPMENT
OF ALLUMINUM INDUSTRY
We also realized the urgent need to develop the alluminium
industry. Apart from the fact that alluminium is the forth best metallic conductor
of electricity in the world after silver, copper and gold, it is also a metal
of the twenty-first century. Because it has corrosion resistant capability, and
it is also lighter. This explains why General Acheampong invited the Russians
to carry out the feasibility study for the development of Integrated Alluminium
Industry at Nyinahin in the Ashanti Region, and the Kibi Bauxite Project in the
Eastern Region.
THE
ECONOMISTS IN THIS COUNTRY
The economists and some other social scientists in this
country are too quick to condemn development programmes of past governments
without subjecting such programmes to proper scientific analysis. They most of
the time think that they have the
monopoly of knowledge and thereby exaggerate their understanding of what
should constitute proper development programme of this country.
What they need to understand is that science and technology
comprise the foundation of modern civilization, and will continue to determine
its future, and therefore any economic development programme that does not lay
emphasis on the development of science and technology is a complete waste of
time. For this reason, I would suggest that parties to an argument should not
exceed their level of competence.
As we can see, the emphasis of science and technology
aspects have been absent from our development programmes since 1978, and the
result of this situation has been the systematic undermining and the
destruction of the state’s ability to provide for its citizens, with the
consequential proliferation of NGOs in our society, all pretending to be doing
what the state has supposedly failed to do for her citizens.
A country that has a comprehensive development programme
does not need such number of NGOs. We must here distinguish between civil
society organizations, and human rights advocates, which are the real
embodiment of National Sovereignty, and NGOs some of which could simply be
described as intelligence gathering organizations for foreign governments.
Any government of Ghana which tries to engage in the
development of science and technology has always been a target of subversion by
the Western industrialized countries. The examples are Nkrumah and Acheampong.
The so-called donor community shape policies in African countries in favour of
businesses of their respective home countries.
The reason for this is to
prevent them from becoming industrialized and thereby developing the capability
to compete with them on the world market with manufactured goods. That is why
they make every effort to prevent their technological advancement, by
discrediting and finally removing from power, African leaders with the
propensity for technological advancement.
Incidentally, all the African governments that are praised
by the Western countries, are not the governments that are involved in a
serious development of high technology. An African government can shout all the
revolutionary or communist slogans in the world, but it will still not be
considered a threat or be taken seriously, until it begins to take a credible step
for the development of high technology.
DR
GEORGE AKOSA
During the NDC period, one Dr George Akosa, who was the
Minister of Industries, Science and Technology, drew up a comprehensive
scientific and technological development programme with the CSIR and the other
scientific institutions under his ministry. That was the closest Ghana had been
to a restoration to the path of real development since 1978. However, before
the implementation of this programme could start, Dr Akosa was removed as the
Industry Minister, and that wonderful programme was never mentioned again. Dr
Akosa is certainly a huge asset of this country and it is unfortunate that he
did not come to our notice during Acheampong’s time. People like him do not
lobby for post, and you have to look seriously for them. But this was how
another opportunity to make this country great once again was thrown away in a
manner that is still very difficult to comprehend.
A GREAT
TRAGEDY
What is happening now is a real tragedy to the superlative
degree. It is difficult to comprehend how a country like Ghana, with such
a level of scientific manpower could be
reduced to this level of underdevelopment. One of the most visible
manifestations of this situation is the number of people with scientific and
technical background who had gone back to school to read Law, instead of
deepening their understanding of the physical world and participating in the
efforts to change it for the benefit of society. It is clearly an indication of
something very serious about our country. It also means that the state has
abandoned its responsibility to provide the very necessary leadership in this
direction.
This is not to say that legal education is not important. In
fact, lawyers are needed in every area of society, including the development
and implementation of scientific and technological programmes. Here, the law
can be used to protect society from incompetent application of new technology.
But this must not be done at the expense of the development of technology
itself.
INCORPORATION
OF SCIENCE IN NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
Science has not been incorporated in the national plan
system to the degree it should have been, as an inseparable component, without
which it is impossible to elaborate and implement the socioeconomic policy in
the broadest sense of the word. As a consequence, the social status of science
and the prestige of scientific work have rapidly declined for the second time
in the history of this country.
The first time this happened was after the overthrow of the
CPP government in 1966, when a considerable number of scientific and industrial
projects were closed down, the training of scientific personnel suspended, and
a number of scholarships of students sent to the Eastern European countries
were withdrawn.
This means that as the kind of scientific and technical
infrastructure that could have created the high demands for their technical
expertise were abandoned, the situation
created also led to the devaluation of their importance. This means, we have
hastened the country’s decline because we have continued to ignore the need to
invest in our future since 1978.
I said in my pamphlet entitled: “Document for Change”,
published just before the 2000 elections, and here I quote: “The reason why we
cannot pay a living wage is because of the primitive scientific and technical
base of our country’s economy. Our scientific and technical development have
not kept pace with our tastes because we destroyed the principal pillars of our
technological advancement in 1966. We now have twenty-first century tastes,
lifestyle and expectation without the corresponding technical capability. It is
important to understand this simple mathematical fact.”
I still stand by this statement, and in my opinion, any
politician who thinks otherwise is not serious, and should not be allowed the
chance to prolong the agony of our people.
SCIENCE
Science is the most forward outpost of human society, the
scout of the future and the most reliable defender of the present. In science,
we cannot start from where the developed countries began. We can only join them
at the point they have reached. This is what I want my beloved countrymen and
women to understand. With the proper application of science, it is possible to
tackle problems of any degree of complexity.
Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov, 1711-1765, one of the
greatest scientists the world has ever produced, put it this way, and here I
quote: “Sciences bring all the affairs of men to the pinnacle of perfection,
and once the people have been instructed in sciences their well-being is
assured’.
June 2008
Peter Amponsah
Tel: 0302- 232034/ 0244310701.
E-mail:
cwsi2008@gmail.com
CJA’S FORUM TODAY
Members of the CJA |
The Committee For
Joint Action (CJA) is starting the first of its series of special fora at the Freedom
Centre in Accra this afternoon.
The Forum starts at 4:00pm and would be
moderated by Mr Kwesi Pratt Jnr, Editor of The Insight.
It will discuss the
current national situation and organizers have invited members and supporters
of all political parties to be present.
The special feature of this forum is that it
has no principal speakers and is seen as a platform for the public to air its
views without any inhibition.
It is expected that all the heavy weights of
the CJA including its convener, Mr Kwasi Adu, Dr Omane Boamah, Minister of
Communications, Mr Okujeto Ablakwa, Deputy Minister of Education and Mr Felix
Ofosu Kwakye, Deputy Minister of Information will show up at the forum.
Others who are
expected at the forum include, Mr Ato Ahwoi, a founding member of the CJA,
Madam Ama Benyiwa Doe, Member of the Council of State and Mr Bernard Monarch,
General Secretary of the Peoples
National Convention.
The CJA is perhaps
the only group which has been consistent in its opposition to fuel price hikes
and increases in utility tariffs.
The CJA has also been
exposing corruption in state institutions since 2005.
It is currently
discussing the attempt by the police to ban demonstrations for a period and
insiders say that a full blown statement will be issued soon.
Western media hails EU oil deal as
potential game changer, despite admitting Al Qaeda holds oil fields.
It was recently reported that the
European Union would be lifting its oil embargo on Syria, in an effort to help
fund what it calls "rebels" operating there. In the Associated Press
article, "EU lifts Syria oil embargo to bolster rebels," it states:
“The European Union on Monday lifted
its oil embargo on Syria to provide more economic support to the forces
fighting to oust President Bashar Assad's regime.
The decision will allow for crude
exports from rebel-held territory, the import of oil and gas production
technology, and investments in the Syrian oil industry, the EU said in a
statement.”
A recent TIME article titled, "Syria’s Opposition Hopes to Win the War by Selling Oil," reports:
A recent TIME article titled, "Syria’s Opposition Hopes to Win the War by Selling Oil," reports:
“On paper, the E.U.’s idea seemed
straightforward. Without an embargo, European companies can now legally begin
importing barrels of oil directly from rebel groups, which have seized several
oil fields in recent months, mostly around the eastern area of Deir Ezzor. That
would provide the opposition with its first reliable source of income since the
revolt erupted in Feb. 2011, and in theory hasten the downfall of Bashar
Assad’s regime, by giving rebels the means to run skeletal local governments
and consolidate their control. As part of the decision, the E.U. ministers also
agreed to export technical equipment, insure the rebels’ shipments of oil and
invest in the rebel oil businesses. Before the war, Syria earned about $3.6
billion a year exporting oil and gas to Europe, with its biggest customers in
Germany and Italy, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.”
The BBC in their article, "EU
eases Syria oil embargo to help opposition," would mention which fields
specifically the EU was planning on exploiting, stating:
“Syria's main oilfields are in the
eastern provinces of Deir al-Zour and Hassakeh, which both border Iraq.”
Just as in Libya, the West is
wasting no time in despoiling Syria's resources, with the pillaging beginning
long before the war even reaches a definitive conclusion. But in addition to
the overt looting of Syria's resources, there is an added complication. TIME
also reports:
“Still, analysts warn that the plan
is deeply flawed-and in fact, that the E.U.’s decision could intensify the
violence in Syria, by setting up a deadly competition for control of a resource
that has languished amid two years of grinding civil war.”
And indeed, this "deadly
competition" has already been taking place, as Al Qaeda's al-Nusra front
in Syria has been overrunning civilian populations, government positions, and
local militias alike across Syria's oil-rich region. In fact, TIME
itself admits that:
“Complicating the issue is the fact
that several of the rebel-held oil fields are believed to be under the control
of Jabhat al-Nusra, which has declared its allegiance to al-Qaeda.”
TIME concedes that "several" oil fields are held by Al
Qaeda, however, other reports across the Western media indicate most, if not
all "rebel-held oil fields" are under Al Qaeda's control.
In the New York Times
article, "Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy," not only
is it admitted that, "nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular
fighting force to speak of," but it specifically mentions the oil fields
the EU seeks to plunder:
“Elsewhere, they [al-Nusra] have
seized government oil fields, put employees back to work and now profit from
the crude they produce.”
Additionally:
“In the oil-rich provinces of Deir
al-Zour and Hasaka, Nusra fighters have seized government oil fields, putting
some under the control of tribal militias and running others themselves.”
In Reuters' "Rebels battle with
tribesmen over oil in Syria's east," it is admitted that:
“Islamist rebels are clashing with
tribesmen in eastern Syria as struggles over the region's oil facilities break
out in the power vacuum left by civil war, activists said on Saturday.
One dispute over a stolen oil truck
in the town of Masrib in the province of Deir al-Zor, which borders Iraq, set
off a battle between tribesmen and fighters from the Nusra Front, an al-Qaeda
linked rebel group, which left 37 killed, according to the Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights.
The fighting, which started in late
March and lasted 10 days, was part of a new pattern of conflict between tribal
groups and the Nusra Front, said a report from the Observatory, a British-based
group which opposes Syria's government and draws information from a network of
activists in the country.”
The Reuters article had forewarned:
“The incentive for disputes over
lucrative resources may be increased by plans by the European Union to lift an
embargo on Syrian oil, which would make it easier to sell.
The EU said this week it wants to
allow Syria's opposition to sell crude in an effort to tilt the balance of
power towards the rebels, who are outgunned by Assad's fighter planes and long
range missiles.”
In other words, the EU's
announcement while lining the pockets of big-oil, is sowing increased chaos,
violence, and death across oil-rich regions of Syria, compounding an already
catastrophic humanitarian disaster of the West's own creation. It is also clear
that Al Qaeda's al-Nusra front is the opposition the EU plans to buy the oil
from, as there are no other "opposition" groups across the country to
speak of according even to the New York Times, and more specifically,
none besides al-Nusra holding significant ground in Syria's oil fields.
The EU is openly preparing to do
business directly with Al Qaeda, in a direct bid to bolster their control over
territory they now occupy, and to overthrow the secular government of Syria in
an unprecedented sectarian bloodbath. While many may claim the EU's policy is
merely yet another manifestation of the corruption and incompetence that are
hallmarks of the failed supranational bloc, it was revealed as early as 2007
that the West sought to intentionally arm and fund sectarian extremists,
including Al Qaeda, to overthrow the Syrian government in just such a sectarian
bloodbath.
In 2007 - a full 4 years before the
2011 "Arab Spring" would begin - Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist
Seymour Hersh in his New Yorker article titled, "The Redirection:
Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on
terrorism?" would state specifically (emphasis added):
“To undermine Iran, which is
predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to
reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration
has cooperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine
operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that
is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed
at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the
bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam
and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.”
Clearly then, it is no accident that
Al Qaeda has the weapons and cash to dominate the so-called
"opposition," nor a mystery as to how they've managed to seize much
of Syria's oil fields. It is also no accident that these very terrorists now
stand to gain immensely by selling stolen oil to the European Union, in a bid
to further increase their strength, capabilities, and reach, in an otherwise
so-far unsuccessful bid to overthrow the Syrian government.
The EU and their US and British
allies, now have yet another deep scar that will permanently disfigure their
reputation, legitimacy, and international standing ad infinitum. For the people
of the West, it is imperative that they identify the corporate-financier
interests truly driving this conspiracy against the Syrian people and both
boycott and permanently replace these interests. If not, they will inevitably,
and in many cases already are, turning their attention, exploitation, and
rackets inward onto their own.
Ex-Lawyer
Convicted in Terror Case Seeks Release
By LARRY
NEUMEISTER Associated Press
NEW YORK May 1, 2013 (AP)
Buoyed by supporters and a petition with nearly 13,000 signatures, a once-prominent New York civil rights lawyer said she has received a federal prison's backing for compassionate release from her terrorism case sentence while she fights advanced-stage cancer.
Lynne Stewart said in a statement released by her husband this week that Texas
NEW YORK May 1, 2013 (AP)
Buoyed by supporters and a petition with nearly 13,000 signatures, a once-prominent New York civil rights lawyer said she has received a federal prison's backing for compassionate release from her terrorism case sentence while she fights advanced-stage cancer.
Lynne Stewart said in a statement released by her husband this week that Texas
prison
medical authorities recommended she be released from her 10-year sentence, an application that would need
approval by the courts and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Stewart, 73, said the medical authorities recommended to the warden at the Federal Medical Center Carswell in Fort Worth, Texas that her treatment would benefit from compassionate release, a rarely granted provision of regulations letting inmates leave prison early for "extraordinary and compelling reasons." The warden then forwarded the application to Washington, Stewart and her supporters said.
Stewart has been imprisoned since late 2009 when a federal appeals court in Manhattan called a judge's two-year, four-month prison sentence too lenient. She was resentenced to 10 years for a 2005 conviction on conspiracy charges for providing support to terrorist organizations by letting an Egyptian terrorism defendant serving a life sentence communicate with followers.
At her first sentencing, U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl cited her more than three decades of dedication to poor, disadvantaged and unpopular clients, calling the work that left her destitute a public service "not only to her clients but to the nation."
She said prison employees had doubted her chances at early release.
"Then I had this white blood cell setback, making me super-vulnerable and was quarantined for a week," Stewart said, citing a medical result that concluded she was vulnerable to the germs of others. She said she learned upon release from quarantine Friday that prison authorities concluded compassionate release was warranted.
"I must say that I was in a state of bliss," Stewart said.
Bureau of Prisons spokeswoman Traci Billingsley said Wednesday that privacy concerns prevent the bureau from providing information about Stewart's case.
She said the bureau's compassionate release policy makes some inmates eligible for release if they have been diagnosed with an incurable disease and life expectancy is 18 months or less.
In a study last year, Human Rights Watch and Families Against Mandatory Minimums said only about two dozen cases from among more than 215,000 federal inmates are recommended for compassionate release annually. A report called on Congress to enact legislation to let prisoners seek early release directly from courts.
Mya Shone, a Stewart supporter in Vallejo, Calif., said nearly 13,000 signatures had been collected to support Stewart's early release. Those signing include Archbishop Desmond Tutu, actor Ed Asner, singer Pete Seeger and Bianca Jagger. Comedian and activist Dick Gregory went on a hunger strike to show support.
She said Stewart had battled breast cancer before her incarceration, along with diabetes and high blood pressure, but it seemed in remission until it was found last June to have spread to the lungs.
Stewart's husband, Ralph Poynter, said Stewart had lost about 60 pounds in recent months but not her humor.
"She says, 'Now the good news, I'm losing weight,'" Poynter said. "We're crossing our fingers, praying to all the gods that we have and the ones that we don't have."
Stewart, 73, said the medical authorities recommended to the warden at the Federal Medical Center Carswell in Fort Worth, Texas that her treatment would benefit from compassionate release, a rarely granted provision of regulations letting inmates leave prison early for "extraordinary and compelling reasons." The warden then forwarded the application to Washington, Stewart and her supporters said.
Stewart has been imprisoned since late 2009 when a federal appeals court in Manhattan called a judge's two-year, four-month prison sentence too lenient. She was resentenced to 10 years for a 2005 conviction on conspiracy charges for providing support to terrorist organizations by letting an Egyptian terrorism defendant serving a life sentence communicate with followers.
At her first sentencing, U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl cited her more than three decades of dedication to poor, disadvantaged and unpopular clients, calling the work that left her destitute a public service "not only to her clients but to the nation."
She said prison employees had doubted her chances at early release.
"Then I had this white blood cell setback, making me super-vulnerable and was quarantined for a week," Stewart said, citing a medical result that concluded she was vulnerable to the germs of others. She said she learned upon release from quarantine Friday that prison authorities concluded compassionate release was warranted.
"I must say that I was in a state of bliss," Stewart said.
Bureau of Prisons spokeswoman Traci Billingsley said Wednesday that privacy concerns prevent the bureau from providing information about Stewart's case.
She said the bureau's compassionate release policy makes some inmates eligible for release if they have been diagnosed with an incurable disease and life expectancy is 18 months or less.
In a study last year, Human Rights Watch and Families Against Mandatory Minimums said only about two dozen cases from among more than 215,000 federal inmates are recommended for compassionate release annually. A report called on Congress to enact legislation to let prisoners seek early release directly from courts.
Mya Shone, a Stewart supporter in Vallejo, Calif., said nearly 13,000 signatures had been collected to support Stewart's early release. Those signing include Archbishop Desmond Tutu, actor Ed Asner, singer Pete Seeger and Bianca Jagger. Comedian and activist Dick Gregory went on a hunger strike to show support.
She said Stewart had battled breast cancer before her incarceration, along with diabetes and high blood pressure, but it seemed in remission until it was found last June to have spread to the lungs.
Stewart's husband, Ralph Poynter, said Stewart had lost about 60 pounds in recent months but not her humor.
"She says, 'Now the good news, I'm losing weight,'" Poynter said. "We're crossing our fingers, praying to all the gods that we have and the ones that we don't have."
Boston - Who did what to whom?
Tamerlan Tsarnaev (L) and Dzorkhar Tsarnaev |
By Jim W. Dean
The smoke has cleared and the dust
on the Boston bombing is finally beginning to settle a bit.
The frenzy on the Internet of everyone pouring over the huge number of images and appointing themselves instant photo analysts has cooled down somewhat, too. But today we will drive the wooden stake through the heart of some of the god awful silly accusations that were made which has hurt the hunt for the truth.
We understand the public is hypersensitive about false flag attacks now. The 911 commission was considered a bad joke by a huge majority around the world, but that went nowhere. The Bush administration and virtually all of America’s institutions acted like they did not care… the proof being that there was no major push for an under oath investigation. That was a huge mistake as it invited more attacks… and they came.
It’s good for people to be skeptical, but going too far plays into the hands of the bad guys as well meaning Internet sleuths can provide good cover for the professional deception crowd. This always takes the attention away from the most vulnerable areas any false flag perpetrators prefer to be ignored.
An experienced Intel analyst right off the bat is going to be hypersensitive about what is not being talked about and/or covered by media and investigators on the first day or two. That is where you start sniffing like a bird dog.
At Veterans Today we stuck our flag in the ground early on the bombing drill, once again, being conducted on the day of a major event. Yes it was in the morning, and in the vicinity of the start of the race while the bombing was at the end.
But this has happened so many times I think now that all live events that are going to have a Homeland Security drill should be canceled, or all those attending be made to sign a release waiver that they understand they might be blown up. After the first day media reports of the drill disappeared. Poof… and they were gone.
With that also went anomaly number
two, the Craft security contractors who were so prominently visible at the
finish line area with their silly hats and uniforms. The backpack fragment of
the first bomb matched exactly one that was clearly photographed on an Israeli
looking Craft contractor. But… corporate media never mentioned a word about
them, something that was an obvious and normal area of inquiry to even a rookie
detective.
That is a sign that the media was ‘waived off’ of the bombing drill and Craft presence on day one… a bad sign, but also a good one in that someone very high up wanted that shut down… and it was. But there was more to it than was discussed on the Internet.
Security at these premiere events always goes to the top companies who have been around a long time with tons of experience. The Olympics is a perfect example. It is the twelve days of Christmas for all the top security companies once every four years where all the best people are brought in.
But Craft Security broke that mold. They were young, with a dead founder shot here in Georgia just north of Atlanta a few months ago, and a working core of SEAL noncoms with no high-tech background. It would be impossible for such a company to get a gig like the Boston Marathon unless someone had ‘walked them in’ as it is called.
They were a front for somebody, most probably the usual, which was an Israeli partner, something set up during the Michael Chertoff days to hard wire Israeli espionage into learning where the holes in our defenses were.
Craft had state-of-the-art crowd surveillance equipment there, very very expensive. We saw it, but it had been withdrawn from the finish line target area, along with all their personnel, conveniently before the bombs went off. We have time lapse video footage of them coming back but stopping at the finish line and calling in for instructions or permission to enter the bombing area… like maybe they were asking “Have they all gone off yet?”
The dome on the top of their
unmarked van had a hyperspectral camera in it… space technology stuff. What it
can do is classified. But there is one thing that it can’t pick up… and that
has to do with how a tracking dog can follow a trail. It can’t pick up
explosives in a pressure cooker if it has been prepared correctly.
Who told these totally untrained brothers to use the only delivery system that could defeat (and provide cover for the failure) a technology being use for the first time at an event like this? Do any of you think they were smart enough to figure that out on their own, or were just lucky?
Who told these totally untrained brothers to use the only delivery system that could defeat (and provide cover for the failure) a technology being use for the first time at an event like this? Do any of you think they were smart enough to figure that out on their own, or were just lucky?
The third anomaly for the day was the total absence of anyone asking why there were no bag searching procedures being carried out anywhere that we could see. That begs the question “Why have any security at all if you aren’t going to check the bomb bags?”
The fourth anomaly, which took several days to percolate up to the top was the sudden entry onto the scene publicly about pressure cooker bombs, like they were a standard. But there was a problem with that. They weren’t.
In Iraq and Afghanistan unexploded mortar and artillery shells were most commonly used where bigger is better. You can’t put one in a pressure cooker. We asked around and people who should know, most of them had never heard of their being used much. But… it was presented to us in the early reports as a common terror tool, which it wasn’t.
We move on now to the most silly overreaction by the Internet sleuths, two stories in one actually. The photo of the man with his legs blown off being rolled away was up the morning after the bombing, on Info Wars… fast… almost too fast. The story presented was that this poor man was a double amputee veteran, and ‘actor’ pretending to have had his legs blown off also came out fast. It had cover and deception all over it.
Numerous blogs and website pounded
on it for days. It was a bogus story of course. While Paul Bauman was being
photographed recovering with his family at this bedside his local history being
covered in the local Boston news. Despite this, the Internet sleuths were
running wild with their ‘actors’ story as proof of a false flag, but one that was
obviously going to be shot down in flames. This was a perfect example of cover
and deception, a text book case.
Next we have the NeoCon/Zionist Lobby diversion. They wanted to connect al-Qaeda to the bombing via Tamerlane’s trip home to Daghastan for terror training, and for those who would not buy that, tag the Russians for ‘not telling us more’ about Tamerlane. We have also shot this down in flames as these two were rank amateurs, and we have proof they were totally untrained.
One, they seem to have used fireworks powder, something that is hard to get in the New England states and of low explosive power. Any trained bomber would have bought a bag of fertilizer, a container of diesel fuel to make a slurry, with one other ingredient that I will not name, and for ten dollars could have take off the fronts of the buildings.
And second, we have a dead giveaway photo of the crazy tactical situation where Tamerlane decided to engage the pursuing cops. Rather than pull the van sideways across the street to provide more cover, and block the smaller car from having its tires shot out so they could escape, they just parked them on the right and left sides of the street. They then took up a firing position in the front of the hijacked Mercedes SUV.
But they did something very stupid
which is immortalized in the twitter photo taken from a resident shooting right
down on them. The Brothers Tsarnaev left the headlights of the Mercedes on,
then went and stood right in front of the car to have a night time shoot out. When
I saw this photo my first thought was, “Nobody could be this stupid… it’s
impossible.”
And lastly, there was a large segment of the Internet crowd that preferred the patsy theory where they had nothing to do with the bombing. The Mercedes carjacking victim, the luckiest person in all of Boston in this whole event, got Tamerlane’s confession. This Chinese guy was smart enough to figure out that the only reason Tamerlane told him was because he was planning to kill him. After all, he said he had just killed a cop.
The Internet sillies can claim all they want that the Chinese guy could be lying, but what would be his motive? He is thrilled to just be alive and wants no publicity, as would I.
And lastly, Tamerlane’s roommates are on record now for trying to hide the bomb-making materials they threw out and the FBI had to dig out of the landfill. You can add to that Dzhokhar’s claiming his brother was the mastermind and one of the roommate’s admission that Dzhokhar told him a month ago that he knew how to make a bomb. So the case of the brothers taking an innocent stroll over to the Marathon finish line that Sunday has some major problems with it.
What do we think at VT… and our counter Intel sources? We suspect that the kids were being monitored by ‘another group’, and were allowed to walk the bombs in… by somebody knowing that there was no bag checking and Craft Security would do nothing.
This was done/allowed by someone who already had a good bit of experience doing such things. I will let you guess who that is, and you will probably be right.
Syria: Attack was a 'declaration of war' by Israel
By Frederik
Pleitgen and Sara Sidner, CNN
A high
ranking Syrian official called an attack Sunday on the nation's military
research facility a "declaration of war" by Israel.
In an interview with CNN, Deputy
Foreign Minister Faisal al Mekdad said the attack represented an alliance
between Islamic terrorists and Israel.
He added that Syria would retaliate
against Israel in its own time and way.
Early Sunday morning, a series of
massive explosions illuminated the predawn sky in Damascus, prompting more
claims that Israel has launched attacks into the war-torn country.
Syria accused Israel of firing
rockets into the Damascus suburb of Jamraya, striking the research center,
Syrian state-run TV reported. The report claimed that the rocket attack on the
research center aided rebels, who have been battling government forces in the
region.
The Israeli military would not
confirm nor deny the Syrian TV claim that Israel had launched rockets.
"We do not comment on these
reports at all," an Israeli military spokesperson said.
An Israeli Army official told CNN
that two rocket interception batteries have been deployed to northern Israel.
The report comes shortly after U.S.
officials first told CNN that the United States believes Israel conducted an
airstrike against Syria. Two U.S. officials told CNN on Friday that Israel apparently launched an airstrike into Syria on Thursday or Friday. Based on initial information, the
United States does not believe Israeli warplanes entered Syrian airspace to
conduct the strike.
The Israeli military did not comment
on the U.S. claim of an airstrike. But Israel has long said it would target any
transfer of weapons to Hezbollah or other terrorist groups, as well as at any
effort to smuggle Syrian weapons into Lebanon that could threaten Israel.
"We are watching everything
when it comes to the movement of these types of weapons. We have the means to
do that," a senior Israeli defense official told CNN's Sara Sidner on
Sunday. The official is not authorized to speak to the media.
Shaul Mofaz, a lawmaker with
Israel's Knesset, told Israeli Army Radio that Israel isn't meddling with
Syria's civil war. But Israel must protect itself from Lebanese militants, he
said.
"For Israel, it is very
important that the front group for Iran, which is in Lebanon, needs to be
stopped," Mofaz said.
"Everything that goes into the
hands of Hezbollah is not directly related to the rebels. Israel never
interfered in the past or today in their actions. Nevertheless, I need to say
that Hezbollah is deeply involved up to its neck in what is happening in Syria.
Hezbollah helps the Iranians navigate against the rebels."
Neither Hezbollah nor the Lebanese
government commented immediately after Sunday's claims.
Sunday's report is the second claim
by Syria this year of a strike against the government defense research
facility,
In January, reports surfaced that
Israeli warplanes targeted the Jamraya research facility. The Syrian government
has said that airstrike killed two workers and injured five others.
A U.S. official told CNN at the time
the Syrian claims were false. The official said Israeli fighter jets targeted a
Syrian government convoy carrying surface-to-air missiles bound for Hezbollah.
But Syria denied there were such shipments.
Claims of Israeli foreign presence
was not limited to Syria; the Lebanese army said Israel flew warplanes over
Lebanon on Thursday, Friday and Saturday.
Lebanese President Gen. Michel
Sleiman condemned the violations as "an attempt to shaken Lebanese
stability," the state-run National News Agency reported Saturday.
The Israeli military had no comment
on the Lebanese claim. But an Israeli defense source said, "We will do
whatever is necessary to stop the transfer of weapons from Syria to terrorist
organizations. We have done it in the past, and we will do it if necessary the
future."
The latest report of rocket attacks
comes as sectarian violence erupted in northwestern Syria.
State media have said their forces
were seeking only to clear the area of "terrorists," the term they
have routinely used when referring to rebel forces.
But the U.S. State Department said
it was "appalled by horrific reports that more than 100 people were killed
May 2" in Beyda, a suburb of Baniyas.
Several opposition groups said
largely Alawite regime forces used tanks, battleships and missile launchers to
target largely Sunni neighborhoods in and around the coastal city of Baniyas.
Government forces killed at least
200 people on Friday and Saturday in Baniyas and its suburbs, the opposition
Local Coordination Committees said Saturday.
But reliable information has been
difficult to obtain because government forces controlled access to the village,
the LCC said.
State-run Syrian TV reported that
government troops and the National Defense militia -- an armed Alawite group
loyal to the government, "have cleaned the area from armed
terrorists" after "they burned civilians' homes and terrorized the
population." The report was supported by interviews with members of the
Syrian army.
U.S. President Barack Obama told
reporters on Friday that he did not foresee a scenario of "American
boots on the ground in Syria" that would be good for that country or the region. Obama
said other leaders in the region want to see al-Assad out of power.
Israel pushing US into another war
General Amos Yadin |
Head of Israel´s Military
Intelligence, General Amos Yadlin, has called for taking steps to break the
axis of resistance - which consists of Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria - by
weakening the Syrian president and ending his rule as soon as possible.
By Yusuf Fernandez
Tel Aviv is trying to pave the way
for a US-led foreign intervention in Syria by accusing Damascus of using
chemical weapons. This is the same excuse, the weapons of mass destruction,
that pro-Israeli neocon circles used in 2003 to launch the Iraq war.
Later, this claim proved to be a lie
as many experts from all over the world had warned in advance. For its part,
Syria has denied that it has used chemical weapons. Syrian Information Minister
was quoted as saying on 24 April that his country would not use this kind of
weapons even in the event of war with its worst enemy, Israel.
On 15 April, head of Israel's
Military Intelligence and former Head of the Institute for National Security,
General Amos Yadlin, called for taking steps to break the axis of resistance -
which consists of Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria - by weakening Syrian President
Bashar Al-Assad and ending his rule as soon as possible. The Channel 2 of the
Israeli TV further quoted Yadlin as saying that “whoever that is not aware that
the fall of Assad is a positive development for Israel, would be incapable of
reading the situation correctly.”
Yadlin added, in a statement at the
conference of the Institute for National Security Studies (INNS) in Tel Aviv,
that he did not rule out a confrontation between Israel and Syria. However, he
warned that it would be a tough war, because a war with the Syrian Army meant
that Scud missiles, and maybe more advanced missiles, would hit Tel Aviv.”
For his part, Brigadier General Itai
Brun, head of the research and analysis division of Israeli military
intelligence, said on April 24 that Syrian troops had probably used Sarin, a
lethal nerve agent, against foreign-backed militants on several occasions in
the past few months. Brun gave no indication that he had a solid evidence, such
as soil samples, typically used to verify chemical weapons use.
Significantly, he made the remarks
as US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel was ending a three-day visit to Israel
focused on the Syrian crisis and Iran´s nuclear energy program. During his
travel, Hagel rewarded Israel with a new whopping arms deal.
The US has described any use of
chemical weapons in Syria as a “red line”, which would probably lead to a
military action. However, the US and its Western allies remained silent when
the sole real example of use of chemical weapons, which took place in the Khan
al Assal village, in the Aleppo province, happened.
This is hardly surprising because
since the beginning of its efforts to promote a civil war in Syria, Washington
has relied heavily on the extremist forces that used the chemical weapons,
particularly the Al Nusra front, which has just declared its official
allegiance to al-Qaeda. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Qatar have sent weapons to
these groups, while Washington has been engaged in a covert operation to help
radical militants from Libya and other nations go to Syria in order to fight
against the Syrian government.
Even worse, the UN, under US
pressure, refused to investigate the Khan al-Assal incident and put it at the
same level as unfounded allegations by armed groups that Syrian troops had used
chemical weapons. Of course, no real evidence was supplied to back such claims
either.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denounced that the US and its European allies had blocked an investigation into claims of chemical weapons use. “Instead of sending a group of experts to a concrete location near Aleppo, as it was promised,” Lavrov said, “they started demanding the Syrian authority give access to all facilities on Syrian territory. They started to require allowing them to interrogate all citizens on the territory of Syria. It is an attempt to politicize the issue and attempt to give the same requirements to Syria as were given to Iraq long ago, where nuclear weapons were looked for.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denounced that the US and its European allies had blocked an investigation into claims of chemical weapons use. “Instead of sending a group of experts to a concrete location near Aleppo, as it was promised,” Lavrov said, “they started demanding the Syrian authority give access to all facilities on Syrian territory. They started to require allowing them to interrogate all citizens on the territory of Syria. It is an attempt to politicize the issue and attempt to give the same requirements to Syria as were given to Iraq long ago, where nuclear weapons were looked for.”
Israel pressure on the Obama
administration
Shortly after Brun made his remarks,
the US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel cast doubt on an Israeli general's
conclusion that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons some months
ago. “Any US response to Syria will be based on American intelligence findings.
Suspicions are one thing,” Hagel told reporters. “Evidence is another.”
For his part, in Brussels, Secretary
of State John Kerry, pathetically declared that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu was “not in a position to confirm” Brun´s assessment, as if a
confirmation by one of the worst enemies of Syria against that country was a
kind of infallible word determining the truth.
US media reports claim that the
allegations by the Obama government of the possible use of chemical weapons in
Syria had led hawkish congressmen to put further pressure on the administration
to act on his previous threat that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would
be a “game changer.” Some Zionist Republicans, who are arms industry lobbyists
as well, have been pressing the Obama administration to send arms to militant
groups fighting in Syria or even launch a military invasion of the Arab country
in an outright attempt to topple the government of President al-Assad.
Senator John McCain, an Arizona
Republican Senator and former presidential candidate, demanded that Obama take
action to enforce his “red line” by setting up a “safe area” on Syrian
territory and a “no-fly zone.” Such steps would require American airstrikes and
the involvement of US troops on the ground. Another Senator, Dianne Feinstein,
Democrat for California and chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
said that a military “action must be taken to prevent larger scale use” of
chemical weapons.
The Washington Post quoted a phrase in a White House letter sent to Congress -
“no option is off the table” - and showed concerns that another US military
action in Syria “would open up a new front in the Islamic world.” The
newspaper, however, also claimed that the an American military invasion against
Syria “could also serve notice to Iran that Obama means what he says when he
draws red lines.”
Unsurprisingly, the “national
coalition,” set up by the American government and made up by some unrepresentative
figures of the Muslim Brotherhood and other exiles, rapidly called for the US
and other Western countries to act “urgently and decisively” to prove that the
US president´s red line was not only “empty words.” This opposition group,
considered as the “legitimate representative of the Syrian people” by
Washington and its allies, does not hesitate to press for a war even though it
means a devastation for their country.
It is noteworthy to point out that
US actions against Syria started some weeks ago. At that time, some media
reported that Washington had already sent 200 American soldiers to Jordan’s
border with Syria to train anti-Syrian militants and, in Hagel’s words,
“improve readiness and prepare for a number of scenarios.” Senior US officials
told Los Angeles Times that these scenarios included the deployment of
20,000 US troops to invade Syria with the excuse of controlling its chemical
weapons stockpile.
During the last meeting of the
so-called “Friends of Syria” group, now reduced to 11 members, Kerry also
announced the US would double its “non-lethal” aid to the Syrian terrorists to
250 million dollars. According to Reuters, a US official said that this aid
“could include for the first time battlefield support equipment such as body
armor and night-vision goggles.” “US officials have said in the past that the
equipment could include armored vehicles and advanced communications equipment,
but Kerry gave no specifics,” added Reuters.
Another ruinous pro-Israel war?
Today, just as it happened a decade
ago in Iraq, untrue claims of the employment of Syrian chemical weapons against
foreign-backed militants are used as an excuse to launch an aggressive war to
benefit Israeli and US geostrategic interests in the Middle East.
Some wonder why the US and Israel
are trying to use the pretext of chemical weapons just now. The real reason is
probably the changes in the battlefield in Syria. Actually, the Western-backed
militants, including those having links with al-Qaeda-, have suffered a series
of humiliating defeats at the hands of the Syrian army, including the loss of
the strategic towns of Al Qussair, near the Lebanon border, and Otaiba, east of
Damascus, both of which had served as important corridors for the passage of
militants and weapons supplied by Western countries and Persian Gulf
monarchies. These Western and Persian Gulf governments now fear that, without a
direct Western military aggression, terrorists will be crushed and completely
defeated in Syria.
Zionist circles in the US link a possible
attack on Syria with another war against Iran with the excuse of curbing its
nuclear program. The real goal of this anti-Syrian and anti-Iranian campaign is
to help Israel achieve hegemony in the Middle East and impose US control over
the strategic and oil-rich regions of the Middle East and Central Asia. These
criminal policies threaten a wider conflagration involving the entire region,
and are ultimately aimed at weakening or destroying China or Russia, US main
rivals in the world, which are promoting a multipolar world.
It is not only the people of Syria
who would suffer the consequences of such an awful war. The American people
would also pay a high price not only in terms of the lives of its soldiers sent
to fight for Israel and US imperialism but also of the inevitable escalation of
restrictive economic and social policies and attacks on living standards that
would be implemented in order to finance this new and also ruinous pro-Israel
war.
No comments:
Post a Comment