Showing posts with label Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Show all posts

Friday, 12 May 2017

AFRICAN VOICES FOR PALESTINE

Amandzeba Nat Brew
Top ranking musicians from all over Africa will gather in Accra next month to pour out their rhythms in solidarity with the people of Palestine struggling against Israeli colonial occupation.

The mammoth event dubbed “African Voices for Palestine”, is an initiative of Ghanaian musical superstars, Amandzeba, and Nii Lante Blankson.

The event is being sponsored by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) in Accra and is intended to expose the real conditions in Palestine, including the establishment of illegal settlements, the denial of basic rights of Palestinian refugees and the lack of access to social services by the Palestinian people.

A key objective of the concert is the mobilisation of the progressive forces in Africa for accelerating the pace of the national liberation struggle in Palestine.

Marwan Bargouthi
Music maestros from Ghana, Nigeria, Liberia, La Cote d’Ivoire, South Africa and elsewhere on the continent are expected to participate in this historic concert.

The collapse of the apartheid regime and system in South Africa was preceded by such concerts in different parts of the world.

The end of racist rule in Zimbabwe was also heralded by a musical concert by the world famous Bob Marley and the Wailers.

Currently, Palestinian political prisoners led by Marwan Bargouthi have embarked upon a hunger strike to press home their demands for fair treatment. 

About a third of the prisoners have been detained without charge or trial.
They include women and children.


Tuesday, 31 January 2017

SPECIAL REPORT ON PALESTINE: Trump’s US Embassy Move To Jerusalem Will Be 'Gift To Extremists,' Jordan Warns

A Flag flutters outside US Embassy in Tel Aviv
Moving the US Embassy in Israel to contested Jerusalem will inflame “the Islamic and Arab streets,” and will serve as a gift to extremists, warned a top official from Jordan, one of Washington’s closest allies in the volatile region.

The unambiguous warning was voiced by Mohammed Momani, the Jordanian information minister, in response to US President-elect Donald Trump’s statements on the issue, AP reported on Thursday.

The US Embassy move would be a “red line” for Jordan, and would “inflame the Islamic and Arab streets,” Momani said, adding that it would also serve as a “gift to extremists.” The controversial plan “will have catastrophic implications on several levels, including the regional situation,” the top official told AP.

There have been a number of signs over the past few weeks which suggest that the relocation of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is likely to happen. Trump’s senior adviser Kellyanne Conway said in December that the embassy move was “a very big priority” for the president-elect.

Israeli officials, including Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, said they have been contacted about finding an appropriate location for the embassy in the city. Washington already has a building in the Arnona neighborhood, originally slated to accommodate the eventual US Embassy.

Trump has made several statements signaling a fresh start for the special relationship between the two nations.

The incoming administration has already nominated David Friedman, a prominent attorney who advised Trump on Israel during the presidential campaign, to be the next US ambassador to Israel.

Friedman, who once was a columnist in several right-wing media outlets, said he wants to “strengthen the unbreakable bond between our two countries and advance the cause of peace within the region.”

US President Donald Trump
The relocation of the embassy, which would apparently signify formal recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and acknowledgment of Israeli jurisdiction over the occupied territory, will have a tremendous impact on US allies in the Middle East.

Momani said that leaders in Middle Eastern capitals will likely “think about different things and steps they should take in order to stop this from happening” as it “will definitely affect the bilateral relationship between countries in the region, including Jordan, and the parties that will be related to such a decision.”

Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem, such as the Al-Aqsa Mosque, have been under Jordanian custodianship for decades. Following the 1967 Six-Day War, East Jerusalem and the West Bank were occupied by the Israelis, resulting in long-lasting hostility between Israel and Jordan. Despite the 1994 Israel-Jordan peace treaty and Jordan’s status as US ally, Israeli rule over East Jerusalem remains a sensitive issue in Jordan and beyond.

Mahmoud Abbas, the head of the Palestinian National Authority, said he does not believe Trump will fulfill his campaign promise. He warns, however, of “irreversible” consequences if the embassy is relocated, according to the Times of Israel.

Saeb Erekat, Palestine’s top negotiator, said if the embassy is moved, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) will withdraw its recognition of Israel, thus undermining hope for Arab-Israeli reconciliation. He added that it would be extremely difficult for US embassies to operate in Arab countries, in part due to public anger over the planned move.

Russia does not recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and maintains its embassy in Tel Aviv, as do most Western countries.

Palestine Will ‘Unleash All Weapons’ On US If Trump Moves Embassy To Jerusalem – UN Envoy
Israeli settlements springs up across occupied Palestine
Palestine's UN envoy promised to make life “miserable” for the White House if it transfers the US Embassy to Jerusalem, following Donald Trump’s remarks suggesting an appeasement to Israel’s land claims in the West Bank.

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, said in Washington on Friday that the move would represent a blatant defiance of Palestine’s rights over occupied Jerusalem. Palestinians would fire back, he said, according to Haaretz. 

Mansour, a US-educated diplomat, stressed the possible transfer of the US Embassy to Jerusalem – partially occupied by the Israelis – would be regarded as a belligerent act towards Palestine. “If they do that, nobody should blame us for unleashing all of the weapons that we have in the UN to defend ourselves and we have a lot of weapons in the UN,” he said.

The Palestinian envoy asserted that he “can make their [the US] lives miserable every day with precipitating a veto on my admission as a member state,” however noting that appealing to the UN Security Council is an unlikely option due to Washington’s right to veto.
The modern dispute over Jerusalem dates back to the 1947 UN partition plan that stipulated the creation of two independent states for both Palestinians and Jews. Jerusalem, a symbolic city for Christians, Muslims, and Judaists, was to be given special international status. The plan turned turned into wishful thinking after Israel occupied East Jerusalem during the 1967 Six-Day War with Arab states, declaring all of the city a unified capital in 1980.

Previous White House administrations never favored recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but the shock results of the US elections have fanned speculations that things might change dramatically.

In the middle of his election campaign in September, Trump said Jerusalem has been “the eternal capital of the Jewish people for over 3,000 years,” promising to accept it “as the undivided capital of the state of Israel” if he is elected.

Later on Sunday, Trump told the New York Times he is determined to reach “the ultimate deal” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “and do it for humanity’s sake.” Nevertheless, his staff made it clear that opposing the Israelis’ settlements in the occupied West Bank is no longer a White House priority.

Speaking shortly after Trump delivered his victory speech in New York, David Friedman, his Israel affairs adviser, told the Jerusalem Post “there is every intention” to keep the campaign promise and move the US Embassy to the city. 

In the years to come, there “would be a stark departure from the long-time American stance that Israeli construction in areas captured in the 1967 Six-Day War makes it more difficult to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians,” Jason Greenblatt, Trump's chief legal officer and a top executive at the Trump Organization, commented on Israel’s Army Radio.

Trump’s victory was welcomed by the Israeli government. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said earlier this week the President-elect “is a true friend of the state of Israel,” adding that “over the years, you’ve expressed your support consistently, and I deeply appreciate it.”

Some members of Netanyahu’s right-wing cabinet claimed that a new, openly pro-Israel policy in Washington is only a matter of time. Naftali Bennett, Education Minister and head of the Bayit Yehudi party, asserted that the era of two-state solution is over.

“Trump's victory,” he stated, “is an opportunity for Israel to immediately retract the notion of a Palestinian state... which would hurt our security and just cause. This is the position of the president-elect, as written in his platform, and it should be our policy, plain and simple.”

Critics of Trump’s presidency argue that he surrounded himself with advisers having strong pro-Israel leanings, which would inevitably bury hopes for the conflict to be solved.

Mansour, however, said he still believes there is a room for maneuver. “Many candidates gave the same election promise but didn’t implement it because what you do when you are campaigning is one thing but when you have to deal with the legal thing it is something else,” he said.

Palestinians May Reverse Recognition Of Israel If Trump Moves US Embassy To Jerusalem – Abbas
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
Palestinians may reverse their recognition of Israel if Donald Trump moves America’s Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas said, adding that the move “would destroy the two-state solution.”

“I wrote to president [-elect Donald] Trump to ask him not to do it. Not only would this move deprive the United States of all legitimacy in playing a role in conflict resolution, it would also destroy the two-state solution,” Abbas said in an interview to Le Figaro newspaper, as citedby AFP.

According to the Palestinian leader, if the transfer takes place, “there would be several options for us, and we would discuss them with Arab countries.”
“Reversing our recognition of the State of Israel is one of them. But we hope that it doesn’t reach that point, and that, on the contrary, we will be able to work with the next American administration,” he added.

Abbas added that the upcoming conference on Israeli-Palestinian relations in Paris “may be the last chance for implementing” the two-state solution.

The dispute over Jerusalem dates back to 1947, when a UN partition plan called for the creation of two independent states for Jews and Palestinians. The city of Jerusalem, which is holy for Christians, Muslims, and Jews, was to be given special international status.

However, the plan was never implemented, as war broke out in the region. Israel seized East Jerusalem during the 1967 Six-Day War with Arab states and declared the entire city its undivided capital in 1980.

The US embassy, as well as other foreign missions, is located in Tel Aviv, Israel’s economic and diplomatic capital. Israel passed a law proclaiming Jerusalem to be its capital back in 1980, although the majority of UN members have not recognized it as such.

Although previous White House administrations have never recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, President-elect Donald Trump has adopted a very different tone.
In December, Trump’s senior adviser Kellyanne Conway stated that moving the embassy was “a very big priority” for the president-elect.

During the election campaign in September, Trump said Jerusalem has been “the eternal capital of the Jewish people for over 3,000 years” and promised to accept it “as the undivided capital of the state of Israel” if elected.

Trump’s apparent eagerness to fulfill his campaign promise has received the backing of Jerusalem officials, who insist that the move will be as easy as changing a sign on a building.

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat said in December that he was confident Trump will deliver on his promise, adding that he has already spoken to the president-elect’s team about the issue.

Trump’s UN Pick Nikki Haley Shows Support For Israel, Hard Line On Russia
Nikki Harley
South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, nominated to be the new US ambassador to the UN, told the Senate she would “always stand by Israel” and took a hard line on Russia, clashing with positions taken by President-elect Donald Trump.

Haley’s opening remarks at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee revolved around the recently adopted UN Security Council Resolution 2334 condemning Israeli settlements, which she blamed on the Obama administration’s decision to forego the US veto.

“I will never abstain when the United Nations takes any action that comes in direct conflict with the interests and values of the United States,” Haley told the lawmakers.

Admitting a lack of experience in foreign policy, the US-born daughter of Punjabi Sikh immigrants – seated behind her, along with the rest of her family, in-laws and friends – Haley argued she could bring a fresh outlook to the UN. She also reassured the foreign policy establishment rattled by Trump’s election that she agreed with many of their cherished causes.

“We are the moral compass of the world,” Haley told lawmakers. “The US is the indispensable voice for freedom,” she added. Her vision of the UN was “an international institution that honors America’s commitment to freedom, democracy, and human rights.”

“I will be a strong voice for American principles and American interests, even if that is not what other UN representatives want to hear. The time has come for American strength once again,” the governor said.

Haley reassured Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire) that she would try to persuade the president about the importance of the UN and change his mind on issues such as NATO, “an alliance that matters.” She agreed with Sen. Todd Young (R-Indiana) that Russia was complicit in the “genocide” taking place in Syria, for which the Republican senator blamed President Bashar Assad.

On the subject of Russia, Haley agreed with Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland) that Crimea is part of Ukraine. The peninsula overwhelmingly voted to join Russia after the February 2014 coup in Kiev.

“We have to make that very clear to them,” she said. “Russia has to make positive actions before we lift any sanctions.”
While Haley agreed with Trump that the US will need Russia’s help with fighting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), she noted: “We cannot trust them and need to continue to be cautious.”

Trump’s announcement that he would nominate Haley to replace Samantha Power as the US envoy to the UN came as a surprise, because the governor was very much a part of the Republican establishment that opposed him during the primary campaign.

“During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices,” Haley had said in January 2016, delivering the GOP response to President Barack Obama’s last State of the Union address. “We must resist that temptation.”

When Trump accused her of being an embarrassment and “weak” on immigration, Haley fired back with “Bless your heart,” a serious Southern insult.

At her confirmation hearing on Wednesday, she was introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), one of Trump’s most outspoken critics in the Republican Party.

Israel Approves 560 New Illegal Homes In E. Jerusalem As Trump Takes Office
Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands
Israel has approved an additional 560 housing units to be constructed as part of its illegal settlement-building initiative in occupied East Jerusalem. The announcement comes 48 hours after Donald Trump took office as the 45th US president.

Israel Radio talked to the Chairman of Jerusalem city hall’s Planning and Building committee, Meir Turgeman, who said the permits had been in the works, but delayed until Barack Obama was out of office.

“I was told to wait until Trump takes office because he has no problem with building in Jerusalem,” Turgeman told Israel Radio, adding that there were hundreds more units awaiting approval.

Nabil Abu Rdainah, spokesman Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, told Reuters: “We strongly condemn the Israeli decision to approve the construction.”

After new approval was granted, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced he had decided to lift restrictions on settlement construction in East Jerusalem.

"There is no longer a need to coordinate construction in the Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem. We can build where we want and as much as we want," the PM's office statement read, Reuters reported.

Netanyahu also said he wants to allow construction of Israeli settlement on all Palestinian territories, which Israel has occupied since the 1967 Six-Day War.
"My vision is to enact sovereignty over all the settlements," the statement added.
Obama – especially towards the end of his presidency – was critical of Israel’s settlement expansion on the grounds that it was destructive to regional peace and risked derailing a stable two-state solution. In his final weeks as president, he had to explain to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu why the US had withheld its traditional UN veto to block a new resolution condemning the illegal settlements. The American veto has protected Israel a great number of times before.

Trump, on the other hand, may take a different line, as he edges US policy closer to Israel – most crucially, with plans to relocate the embassy of the United States from Tel Aviv to disputed Jerusalem. This has been welcomed warmly by the Israelis, while sending shock waves throughout the Arab world – with Jordan openly declaring that the move may lead to an explosion in radical Islamism, and Palestine threatening to revoke its recognition of the Israeli state.

Israel’s final approval of the new building permits was issued Sunday, marking a 180-degree reversal in Washington’s policy toward Tel Aviv. But settlement-building was unlikely to stop anyway, given that in 2016 it was revealed that hundreds of projects were still in the pipeline, to be built in the coming years.

The current projects, according to Reuters, had been taken off the agenda in December at the last minute, following Netanyahu’s orders not to anger outgoing US President Barack Obama.

But Israeli right-wingers expect Trump to be far more cooperative on the matter.
Israel has been building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank since 1967. The Palestinians believe East Jerusalem to be theirs. But Israel has been forcefully denying Palestinians the territory.

The construction of these settlements, illegal under international law, has been the subject of growing controversy, mounting criticism from the international community, and a deteriorating security situation between Israelis and desperate Palestinians.
According to Netanyahu, he will discuss the latest with Trump over the phone on Sunday.

“Many matters face us, the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the situation in Syria, the Iranian threat,” the Israeli PM said.

Two days ago, the energy and infrastructures minister, Yuval Steinirt, said in an interview to Army Radio that “we are all praying that, alongside his sense of humor and colorful personality, Trump will understand the weight of responsibility lying on his shoulders and will turn out to be a courageous and serious president.”
He added, “I very much hope and believe that he will move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.”

‘Assault On All Muslims:’ Jerusalem Grand Mufti Slams Potential US Embassy Move
The Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple of Mount
The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem has condemned the plans to move the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which were earlier announced by President-elect Donald Trump. The mufti said it would be an “assault” on every Muslim in the world.

"The pledge to move the embassy is not just an assault against Palestinians but against Arabs and Muslims, who will not remain silent," Muhammad Hussein, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, said during a sermon at the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem's Old City, AFP reports.

"The transfer of the embassy violates international charters and norms which recognize Jerusalem as an occupied city," he added. Earlier, Palestinian leaders called for weekly Friday prayers at mosques across the Middle East to protest Trump’s plans to move the US embassy to Jerusalem.

They also stressed that such move could be regarded as recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital, thus sparking tensions across the Middle East and seriously hampering peace efforts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to lend assistance in preventing the move. The plea came in a letter that a top Palestinian official, Saeb Erekat, passed on to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Friday.

"The letter asks President Putin to do what he can about the information we have that President-elect Donald Trump will move the embassy to Jerusalem, which for us is a red line and dangerous," Erekat said after the meeting with Lavrov, as cited by AFP.

Abbas also sent another letter to Trump, calling on him not to move the embassy. The Palestinians also included the issue into the agenda of the meeting of foreign ministers from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which is due to take place in Malaysia on January 19.

Last Friday, Mohammed Momani, the Jordanian information minister, warned against the relocation of the US embassy in Israel, stressing that it would “inflame the Islamic and Arab streets” and become a “gift to extremists.”

He went on to say that Middle Eastern countries would likely “think about different things and steps they should take in order to stop this from happening” as it “will definitely affect the bilateral relationship between countries in the region, including Jordan, and the parties that will be related to such a decision.”

In the meantime, there have been several signs demonstrating that Trump could be serious about fulfilling this plan. Trump’s senior adviser Kellyanne Conway said in December that the embassy move was “a very big priority” for the president-elect.

Israeli officials, including Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, said they have been contacted about finding an appropriate location for the embassy in the city.

Following the 1967 Six-Day War, East Jerusalem and the West Bank were occupied by the Israelis and this issue still remains one of the key stumbling blocks in the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel has proclaimed the whole of Jerusalem as its capital, while Palestinians regard the eastern part of the city as the capital of their own future state.

The United States and most UN member states, including Russia, which maintains its embassy in Tel Aviv, do not recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

Erekat said last week that if the embassy is moved, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) will withdraw its recognition of Israel, thus undermining hopes for Arab-Israeli reconciliation.








Tuesday, 20 December 2016

MAHAMA: He Can Come Back But Not For Eight Years

President John Dramani Mahama
By Ekow Mensah
President John Dramani Mahama can most certainly bounce back to power in 2020 but he can only serve for one term.

This is contrary to some public speculation that because he has not served two consecutive terms, he can run for another two terms of four years each.

The fact is that article 66 clauses I to 4 of the 1992 constitution on the term of office of the President does not make reference to “consecutive” terms.

Article 66(2) of the constitution stipulates that “A person shall not be elected to hold office as President of Ghana for more than two terms.

From the strict interpretation of this clause President Mahama can only serve one additional term as President if he wins the 2020 election.

This fact would greatly influence the decision of the President and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) about whether or not he will contest the 2020 elections.
The question is, will the NDC put up a candidate who can only serve one term and why?

Already, it appears that several leading members of the NDC are lacing their boots to join the contest for the presidential candidature of the party.

 It is still not clear if President Mahama will like to throw his hat into the ring.

Editorial
FAREWELL TO A FRIEND
On January 7, 2017 President John Dramani Mahama will have to step down from office and play a new role as a former leader of Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah’s Ghana.

How well he did as a leader is still a subject of intense debate and we have no interest in doing what future generations can do better.

No matter what his circumstances are today, President Mahama was a significant part of our movement and our friend.

He was a part of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and joined the struggle to end the illegal blockade of Cuba and free the Cuban Five.

He also provided tremendous support which enabled Ghana to host the 8th Pan African Congress in Accra.

As was to be expected many comrades including those of us who work on The Insight disagreed with some of the actions and policies of his administration.

We opposed the attempt to privatize the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG), the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the European Union, the granting of asylum to the GITMO 2, references to Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation and the embarkation on the path of general neo-liberalism.

Our opposition was principled and we cannot have regrets.

As the days draw near for President Mahama to exit the Flagstaff House, we can only wish him well in his future endeavours and hope that he has learnt his most important lessons.

Our lesson is that it is only leaders who remain absolutely faithful to the masses all the time who can count on their support all the time.

Palestinian Lives Matter And Not Just When They Are Lost
Palestinians wait to cross an Israeli army checkpoint
By Tony Abbott 
The sun sets on the Israel-Gaza border January 4, 2009. 
Palestine has never been the same since the 1917 Balfour Declaration, by which the British government allowed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” with daily violence highlighted when the plight of Palestinians living under the Israeli occupation is referred to in recent history.

Daily reports of violence, however, should not make the disturbing aspects of normal life under the Zionists' occupation seem any less important.

From minor attacks on Palestinian residents in different parts of the country to several full-scale wars, killing and injuring civilians is part and parcel of the nation’s contemporary narrative.

In its latest aggression on Gaza Strip alone, the Israeli regime forces claimed the lives of nearly 2,200 Palestinians, including 577 children, according to the United Nations figures.

Apart from all-out wars, violence in individual incidents under the Israeli rule is a part of the Palestinian people’s daily life, with hundreds of cases registered every year, frequently blamed on Palestinians by Tel Aviv.

Human lives matter or at least that is what we are made to believe in by taking a look at news websites, most of which are replete with reports of human fatalities over various reasons.

As sensitive intelligent creatures, we humans associate ourselves with the victims, imagine ourselves in the shoes of an assailant, and judge; our hearts could go out to those having lost their loved ones while we could feel outraged at the perpetrator.

This is all common and part of who we are as humans, capable of empathy, a feature that could also be used in the world of media to manipulate us.

In the case of the Palestinians’ sufferings, sound judgment makes any human being feel sorry to some extent for those falling victim to Israeli crimes no matter how it happened, shot dead by a single heavily-militarized soldier, starved nearly to death to make a voice heard, or made homeless by the regime’s bulldozers.

The plight of Palestinians, however, far surpasses the violence mostly highlighted by human rights and Islamic outlets while sporadically reported by the Western media.

Daily life under occupation has yielded a whole lot of troubles for the Palestinian people, which they have to deal with on a daily basis, while their sufferings going under-reported.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister who superintends over the gross violation of the rights of Palestinians 
Take water for example, a basic right and necessity for every living creature. The Zionist regime has limited the Muslim nation’s access to water resources, shrinking water consumption of people in the West Bank in 2014 to 21 liters less than the 100-liter minimum figure per capita per day, recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).

The regime has also granted illegal Israeli settlers exclusive access to many water springs in Palestinian territories, making life a misery for farmers who depend on their crops for a living.

This is while the regime is making $300 million every year out of the European export of goods, produced by profitable enterprises set up in over 230 settlements, regarded illegal by the UN and most of the world countries.

The regime’s nearly 100 fixed checkpoints in the occupied West Bank are also put in place to insure that movement remains a grueling task for Palestinians on their own land.

On the other side of the spectrum, Tel Aviv does not spare any efforts to irritate Palestinians by depriving them of less immediate needs, for instance by not providing them with 3G Internet and keep their connectivity speed one of the slowest on earth.

However, decades of systematic crackdown by the occupying forces have taught Palestinian generations that resistance remains the sole method to nullify the regime’s inhumane tactics.

Many activists assert that it is time to pay more attention to resistance against the occupation of Palestine if the world is actually serious about ending the Israeli aggression in the region. 

“I believe that the most important thing is to understand that if we don't pay attention to these efforts, they are invisible, and it's as if they never happened,” said Brazilian documentary filmmaker Julia Bacha in a 2011 Ted Talk.

In her Talk, which followed eight years of documenting the situation in Palestine, Bacha recounts the story of the Palestinian town of Budrus, whose people managed to force the regime through peaceful means not to grab nearly half of their town for the sake of constructing the annexation wall as planned.

Israel's illegal move to construct a separation sparked outrage among Palestinian officials and residents as well as peace activists across the globe.

The Palestinians, however, mounted a 10-month protest to stop the wall from being built on their olive groves, which would have occupied 40 percent of their land and cut their access to the rest of the West Bank.

“Through inspired local leadership, they launched a peaceful resistance campaign to stop that from happening,” she says.

Bacha highlights the “the power of attention” to the Palestinian resistance, which would ultimately result in multiplication of nonviolent methods to bring about change for the Muslim people, whose lives matter and must not be lost.

“If they multiply, their influence will grow in the overall Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And theirs is the kind of influence that can finally unblock the situation. These leaders have proven that nonviolence works in places like Budrus. Let's give them attention so they can prove it works everywhere.”

This is Why Obama's Successor Needs to Look at the World From a Different Angle
Donald Trump, the next President of the USA
The next US administration will need to soberly reassess the results of Washington's decade-long foreign policy and find a healthy balance between the use-of-force approach and successful diplomacy, experts say, turning the spotlight on the US' deteriorating relations with Russia and China.

The next US administration will need to begin with a "sober evaluation" of the world as it is, rather than as the American president and the country's senior officials wish it to be, American foreign policy analysts Dimitri K. Simes, Pratik Chougule and Paul J. Saunders highlight in their article for The National Interest.

"US leaders will need to define vital national interests, with a realistic hierarchy of international priorities. They will need to review the extent to which current policies, including alliances, serve US interests. And they will need to establish clear objectives in relations with rival major powers China and Russia," US scholars noted.

"Then, and only then, will the next president be able to design policies that further both immediate needs and enduring strategic objectives," they stressed.

Among a number of crucial foreign policy issues, the scholars highlighted the deterioration in relations between the US and Russia, as well as between Washington and Beijing.

The analysts call attention to the fact that few policies have alarmed the Kremlin as much as NATO's expansion. "A bold move as this almost literally moved NATO to the suburbs of St. Petersburg, incorporating Estonia and Latvia into NATO was especially difficult for Moscow to stomach," the US foreign policy analysts pointed out, adding that the NATO expansion toward Russia's borders have prompted Moscow's suspicions that the bloc remained what it used to be during the Cold War-ear — an anti-Russia alliance.  

"Few recall that Vladimir Putin originally sought to make Russia a major part of a united Europe," the analysts reminded their readers.

Against this background, it is understandable why the Russian leadership is seeking to establish new alliances and to bolster the country's defenses, Simes, Chougule and Saunders remarked, adding that the recent collapse of the US-Russian agreement on Syria has added insult to injury.

On the other hand, the scholars continued, Russo-American tensions "are particularly troubling given how maladroitly Washington has approached its other major rival" — China. According to the analysts, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's approach toward Beijing to some extent contributed to the deterioration in bilateral relations between the US and China.

For its part, Obama's "Asian pivot" has further exacerbated the situation. "President Obama's 'pivot'-now known as 'rebalance'-to Asia lent further credence to Chinese concerns over a hostile US containment and regime-change policy," they emphasized, bemoaning the fact that under Obama "this pattern of needlessly provoking China has become the norm."

While the next administration will need to correct the US' foreign policy course there are certain obstacles in the way of strategic change. "If the next president pursues a new strategy, he or she should expect resistance from America's entrenched foreign-policy establishment… Recent fiascos from Iraq to Libya have been bipartisan affairs, and many will seek to defend their records.

Similarly, foreign-policy elites in both parties have internalized the notion that 'American exceptionalism' is a license to intervene in other countries and that 'universal aspirations' guarantee American success," US scholars warned. For his part, Philip Giraldi, a former counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), notes that the direction of the US foreign policy depends on who will occupy the While House following the November election. 

He draws attention to the fact that in contrast to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has repeatedly signaled that she will pursue a tougher policy toward Russia and China than her predecessor, Barack Obama, if elected. "Unfortunately, she [Hillary Clinton] would find little opposition in Congress and the media for an extremely risky foreign policy, and would benefit from the Washington group think that prevails over the alleged threats emanating from Russia, Iran, and China," Giraldi writes in his op-ed for The American Conservative.

In an interview with Svobodnaya Pressa, an independent Russian media outlet, Vladimir Bruter, an expert on foreign affairs with the International Institute of Humanitarian and Political Studies and the Valdai International Discussion Club, suggested that the US is unlikely to switch from the policy of diktat to the policy of dialogue in the near future.

The expert highlighted that the US still remains a military power second to none. At the same time, the US' concept of "American exceptionalism" is built on foundations of sand: the United States is a relatively young state; it has not always been a hegemon and won't maintain its global dominance forever. In light of this, Washington needs to reconcile itself with a new multi-polar reality and take other geopolitical players' interests into consideration.