ADAKABRE AND AKUFO-ADDO; What are the Real Issues?

Adakabre Frimpong Manso

It is perfectly within the right of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) or any other political party to refuse to participate in any radio or television program.

In fact, all political parties or Ghanaians have the right to boycott media platforms without good reason.

However the recent decision of the NPP to boycott political programs on “Neat FM” and “Okay Fm” raise important issues worthy of examination.

It is significant that in the press release announcing the boycott, the NPP did not accuse the two stations of fabrication of information.

The NPP also did not claim that the two stations have deliberately refused to give it the opportunity to state its side of the case.

Indeed, all the NPP states is that it is unhappy with the two stations because their ace presenters Adakabre and Otikese have over a period allowed their platforms to be used to denigrate the party and its flag bearer.

What can this mean?

Opposition leader, Nana Akufo Addo is angry.

In very simple language, this can only mean that the NPP does not like issues which are discussed on the Platforms and perhaps how they are discussed.

It also means that if the two stations will stop discussing issues which the NPP does not approve and which will not harm the image of its flag bearer, the party would end the boycott.

In a situation where there have not been any ethical violations, the use of boycott as a means of getting a media house to do the wishes of an institution or person can only amount to intimidation and bullying.

Since the confrontation between the NPP and the media houses broke out, Adakabre has alleged that Nana Akufo- Addo, the presidential candidate of the NPP abused him and that some supporters of Akufo- Addo threatened him with death.

Honourable Titus Glover, NPP Member of Parliament has denied the allegation and said that Nana Akufo- Addo only refused to shake the hands of Adakabre and said that he disapproves of his attempt to use his platform to denigrate him.

Under any custom refusing to shake anybody’s hands would be seen as snubbing.

Adakabre claims to have concrete evidence of the threats to his life and some sections of the public want to see it.

Did NPP chaps really threaten to kill Adakabre for making the NPP look bad?

Well, if this is proven  it will amount to extraordinary intolerance on the part of political activists.

 It is also claimed that Adakabre campaigned for one of the opponents of Nana Akufo-Addo in the NPP primaries and that should explain his apparent dislike of Nana Akufo – Addo.

This is most interesting given the fact that Adakabre has always claimed to be CPP and the legitimate question is what was a CPP man doing in the presidential primaries of the NPP?

In any case there were many journalists and presenters who either openly or clandestinely campaigned for Nana Akufo- Addo in the NPP‘s presidential campaign.

Some or most of those journalists have also claimed to be CPP, PNC or some other contraption. Should their media platforms be treated the same way Okay and Neat FM’S are being treated by the NPP?

Finally, what are the issues which have been discussed on the political platforms of these two stations and why do they annoy the NPP and its leaders?

Could it be issues related to the suspension of some leaders of the NPP including Mr Paul Afoko, the National Chairman?

Are we being told that Paul Afoko, Sammy Crabbe and KwabenaAgyapong should not be given any space in the media?

These are the issues!

Editorial

Good news

The news that a multi million-dollar ceramic factory at the Free Zone enclave in Sekondi in the Western Region will begin operations by the end of August this year is gratifying.

The $100 million project is expected to produce floor tiles, toilet bowls and other ceramic products using local raw materials, such as limestone, kaolin clay, feldspar and silica deposits identified in the Western and Central regions.

The factory also has an inbuilt thermal plant to generate its required megawatts of power using gas from the Ghana Gas Company (Ghana Gas) processing plant at Atuabo.

According to the Vice-General Manager of the Wangkang Ghana Group, Mr. Peng Chao, the company currently had a total of about 250 employees, but “when production lines are in full session, we are sure to engage more than thousand workers.”

This piece of good news has the attention it deserves as it is probably only viewed as another news item.

On the other hand, some may argue that this is not the first time they are hearing about a ceramic factory in Ghana.

But we believe the news deserves some celebration because those behind the factory appear to have done their homework well.

It is true that not all factors can be controlled but we believe that such endeavours which aim to make use of our natural and human resources point the way to the sustainable and happier future.

It should be given every critical support even as we explore more of such opportunities.

THE OKYEHENE CAN DO BETTER

Amoatia Ofori Payin

By Dr. Michael J.K. Bokor

News reports that the Kyebi Executive Council has banned two Eastern Regional executive members of the NDC from visiting the Okyehene’s palace in Kyebi might be regarded by some as surprising. Not so to me. Inklings from the posturing of Kyebi citizens opposed to the NDC, political events involving them, and the drift of their public utterances could lead nowhere but to this juncture. A careful analysis of such inklings persuaded me long ago that sooner than later, something of the sort would happen to clear doubts about the political dimensions of chieftaincy in that part of Ghana. And the moment has arrived.

According to the Kyebi Executive Council, the two NDC officials (Regional Chairman, TawiahBoateng, and Youth Organizer, Appaw Haruna Owiredu) had calumniated the Paramount Chief, Osagyefo AmoatiaOforiPanin; hence, the decision to ban them from entering his palace. Speaking for the Council, D.M. Ofori-Attah (described as Assistant Akyem State Secretary) claimed that Boateng and Owiredu “have consistently defamed the Okyehene”. He cited two instances:

1. In the course of the 2012 election petition hearing, the Okyehene paid a courtesy call to President Mahama at the Flagstaff House and advised him to help maintain calm and peace in the country by respecting whatever decision the Supreme Court might make. According to him, Boateng and Owiredu opposed that visit and took to the media to make false and malicious claims against the Okyehene. He said they accused the Okyehene of wading into political matters when he had not been invited to do so.

2. When the Okyehene and some of his council members inspected road construction in the region, especially the Suhum road, he called on President Mahama to expedite action on the road project because of the negative impact on the socioeconomic lives of the people. He also urged the government to fulfill “what it has promised the people”. According to Ofori-Attah, both Boateng and Owiredu “lambasted the Okyehene for complaining about the poor roads, arguing that he was involving himself in political matters” (See http://www.myjoyonline.com/politics/2016/April-1st/two-eastern-region-ndc-executives-banned-from-okyehenes-palace.php#sthash.7w4ADClY.dpuf).

What next? The only way Boateng and Owiredu could be “invited to visit the palace would be when they openly apologize to the Okyehene for their actions and utterances”. But Boateng and Owiredu have rejected that push, saying that they didn’t do anything of the sort being imputed to them and won’t apologize. The tug of war has begun and this kind of head-butting won’t serve any useful purpose but muddy the political waters. A planned visit to the Okyehene’s palace by the newly appointed Eastern Regional Minister has already been cancelled in consequence. Meantime, it has been reported that the youth of Akyem are agitating for the scope of the ban to be widened to rope in all NDC officials in the Eastern Region. 

MY COMMENTS

The decision by the Kyebi Executive Council is backward and inadmissible, no matter what. Of course, the Okyehene’s palace is either a private space or part of the public sphere, depending on how one sees it and the extent to which it is used in local and national affairs. Indeed, it has been used for purposes other than chieftaincy. So, I can stick my neck out to say that it is part of the public sphere for as long as it continues to host events involving public officials and open discussions bordering on local and national politics. As to who qualifies to enter it, I leave it to the palace officials to determine. But banning party officials from entering there won’t serve any useful purpose other than deepening suspicion and raising needless tension. Are these NDC officials the first and only people to have openly criticized the Okyehene—criticisms that are being misrepresented as insults? Why would the Kyebi Executive Council not consider the spate of insults and unruly behaviour by others as worthy of their attention? Has the Okyehene ever condemned those openly insulting public figures?

Records exist on how some citizens of Akyem took matters into their own hands by organizing to prevent President Mahama from campaigning in Kyebi toward Election 2012. There is also ample evidence of animosity toward President Mahama over his comments regarding “galamsey” in the Akyem area. More exists about the hostility toward the NDC over the years, all because the party is considered a threat to the NPP and just because the NPP’s flagbearer hails from there. So, anything that can tarnish the NDC’s image must be done.

This ban is politically motivated and deserves condemnation. The allegations made by the spokesman for the Kyebi Executive Council are baseless, especially if one places them in context. How many times hasn’t the Okyehene himself made scathing comments about the performance of President Mahama? How many times hasn’t he turned his “gun” on other Ghanaians to create the negative impression that they aren’t worth being in public office? How many times haven’t the Okyehene’s own “subjects” taken him to task regarding happenings in his domain? Do we not remember the ban that he imposed on one of them, whom he fined to provide drinks and 70 rams?

More troubling is the vacuous claim by that Ofori-Attah that Boateng and Owiredu made“false and malicious claims” against the Okyehene. What are these “false and malicious claims”?

Folks, it is wrong for anybody to bad-mouth the other, regardless of the social status of the target. That’s why no one will support Boateng and Owiredu if, indeed, they did what they are being banned for. It is equally important to distinguish aggressive criticisms or comments from insults. By criticizing the Okyehene for inspecting roads and using the occasion to create the impression that the government wasn’t fulfilling its promises to the people, Boateng and Owiredu were merely doing their political work. Questioning the Okeyene’s motive and wondering whether he was the Minister of Roads and Highways to do what he did was only a way of adding humour to that criticism. No insult involved here.

Again, by criticizing the Okyehene for his part in public discourse regarding the NPP’s useless petition, they only sought to open his eyes to the fact that he had been one-sided in his approach. I haven’t come across anything to prove that the Okyehene reached out to Akufo-Addo in that sense. Why would he approach President Mahama that way and leave out Akufo-Addo whose utterances and public posturing portended more danger to Ghana’s stability than President Mahama’s could do? A good political activist would read deeper meanings into such a move by the Okyehene and criticize him as Boateng and Owiredu did. Nothing wrong about that criticism. So, why fault them?

On a more serious note, let us draw the attention of the Okyehene and his supporters to the open denigration and calumniating of President Mahama by all manner of people opposed to him and the NDC. It is all over the place, coming from Akufo-Addo and his NPP and many others who are using insults as a political weapon. What has the Okyehene said about such people? He acts only when hit?

Considering the “explosive” nature of partisan politics in the country, what the Okyehene has set in motion is likely to be taken to disturbing heights if replicated in other traditional areas of the country. Do we not remember the move by the Sunyani Traditional Council against the NPP’s Regional Chairman or the baring of teeth at KwadwoOwusuAfriyie by queen mothers in that region?

The Kyebi Executive Council has rather slung mud at the Okyehene; and he should look more deeply into the matter to revoke that useless ban. What will Okyeman gain from the ban, anyway? I know that the Okyehene is an educated and enlightened man of substance who shouldn’t have allowed himself to be pulled into this kind of recklessness. The earlier he settles doubts, the better chances are that he will avoid being drawn into any bitter politicking of the sort that is rolling. I advise him to consider his status as all-encompassing, which calls for temperance, tolerance, and dignified public rhetoric. What the Kyebi Executive Council has wrought negates those attributes. He must act decisively to be able to work with all, regardless of political inclinations or differences. For now, the ban, says a lot about his own political leaning, which is not good for him. Is that what he wants to be known for?

I shall return…

E-mail: mjbokor@yahoo.com

AKUFO - ADDO DENIES

Nana Akudo Addo

By Ekow Mensah

Nana Akufo-Addo, the Presidential Candidates Of The New Patriotic Party (NPP) denied flatly that he had an interest in undermining the Chairman and General Secretary of his party.

The Nana Ohene Ntow Committee Report, a copy of which has been obtained by The Insight claims that Nana Akufo  Addo made the denial in an interaction with the Committee.

 The Report said “Towards the closing stages of its deliberations, the Committee moved to the flag bearer ‘s office to interact with him and to seek his views on the issues being investigated by the Committee .

“The committee brought to his attention the General Secretary’s earlier report to the committee in which he (General Secretary)said he had sighted a document prepared by certain close associates of the Flag bearer, detailing how national officers perceived not to be loyal to the Flagbearer should be undermined.

“ Asked whether he has any knowledge of such a document, the Flag bearer responded in the negative, stressing thus; what will be the benefit to me if the National Chairman and the General Secretary were undermined and prevented from working”

On the General Secretary’s suggestion that a public declaration by the Flag bearer of a vote of confidence in General Secretary and the 2nd vice chairman and the National Chairman as a means of discouraging those who are undermining the three national officers, the Flag bearer said he did not think that was a solution to the  current impasse.

“The flag bearer, however, stressed that what he thinks is that the principle of group decision making which underpins the party’s constitution should be respected and upheld by all leaders of the party; that this is the surest way of curing the current ills of the party”

The full text of the Ohene Ntow report will be published in the next issues of “The Insight”

Editorial

Why the silence?

Chief Benny Wenda, the leader of the independence movement in the West Papua claims that Indonesia has killed more than 500,00 of his people for daring to protest against their colonial status.

 He speaks of many atrocities against the indigenous people of the Island, which is full of riches.

The Island is reported to have the world’s largest deposit of gold and there are credible reports that it  is laden with oil and gas.

West Papua was initially a Dutch colony and it was claimed by Indonesia in the late 1960s.

The Insight is shocked by the world’s silence in the face of all the atrocities allegedly committed against the Islanders.

We urge the United  Nations and all international Human Rights Organisation to pay attention to what is happening in West Papua and to investigate these grave allegations.

The Debate

President John Mahama

The debate between the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) is not sophisticated at all and it woefully fails to address the fundamental problems of the Ghanaian Economy.

Communicators of the two parties are haggling over micro-economic indicators instead of trying to establish why those indicators remained poor for more than 30 years.

 Whose inflation figure was lower than the other is not the issue here.

 Ghanaians need to establish why in the face of abundant natural resources; they are unable to resolve their problems including the lack of access to social services.

In our view, the fundamental problem is that Ghanaian resources are no longer controlled by the people of Ghana.

Marching under the orders of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, Ghana has embarked upon the reckless path of neo-liberalism and all our major assets have been handed over to multi –national corporations from the colonial metropolis.

Nana Akufo Addo, Opposition Leader

They are exploited solely for the purpose of bloating the bank accounts of businesses in London, Paris, Hamburg and Washington.

The debate needs to be refocused on what can be done to ensure that the people of Ghana control their own resources.

 If this is not done, the debate about micro-economic stability will continue to be completely irrelevant.

WOOOW! WHICH IS TRUE?

Nana Akufo Addo, wake up from thy slumber!

By  Ekow Duncan.

This week, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, the presidential candidate of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) slept again and that is true.

If Nana is truly Ghanaian and lives in Ghana then State of the Nation Addresses may capture the fact that he has been sleeping in very awkward places and at times which may not be altogether convenient.

 He went to the Hall of Physicians and Surgeons to deliver what had been styled as the “True State of the Nation Address” and was captured by the “Daily Post” newspaper sleeping comfortably.

Sleeping in public and at such events cannot always be strange. It is associated with people who work beyond their capabilities. People who are tired and sometimes people whose age is catching up with them.

 At 72 years, sleeping in public is not and cannot be strange for Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo who is struggling to beat the national record if he is elected as President of Ghana in November 2016.

 He will become the oldest President ever elected in Ghana.

Nana jumped up from his sleep and began pontificating about what he called the true state of the nation address. He went back deep into history and dug up a few promises which were not fulfilled when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) captured power in 2001.

Can you remember that in 1992, the New Patriotic Party promised that if it was elected, it would make sure that District Chief Executives, Municipal and Metro Politian Chief Executives are elected by universal adult Suffrage? 

The NPP won the 2000 elections and stayed in power for eight-long years without fulfilling this promise.

Significantly Nana was part of the Kufuor administration, which made the promise it failed to keep so how can he convince the people of Ghana that this time it will be kept.

First, Nana was not just part of the Kufour administration. He was a most important part as Attorney- General and if the promise was to be kept he had to start the process of constitutional amendments.

What did Nana do to help Kufuor keep this promise? And if he didn’t do anything to help Kufour keep this promise why should he be believed now?

The problem with Nana Addo is that what he says is calculated to win votes for him to become the next president of Ghana.

If something is true and it can’t win votes, it would not be said. And if something is not true and it can win votes it would be said.

 With all the noise about the true state of the nation address, Nana Addo made no comment about the fact that Ghanaian resources are no longer controlled by Ghanaians and that they are exploited solely to enlarge the bank accounts of Multi-national corporations originated from the colonial metropolis.

The fixation with micro-economic stability is not new and is a complete waste of time. The levels of inflation, interest rates and Gross Domestic Product have never really told the full story of the living conditions of the people of Ghana.

 If Nana Addo were paying attention, he would have realized by now that these same noises about micro-economic indicators were made by people like Dr Kwesi Botchwey , Dr Joe Abbey and Jerry John Rawlings  and they didn’t take Ghana anywhere.

The true state of the nation indeed!