Friday, 17 March 2017

DID NANA LEAVE OUT ANY THING?


President Nana Addo delivers independence day speech
The President, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, used his speech on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of Ghana's independence to retell the story of the struggle - memorializing victims and celebrating 'heroes' alike. He recalled seminal moments in the long struggle for self-government, like the formation of the Aborigines Rights Protection Society on August 4, 1897 and their unprecedented but successful mobilization of opposition to the Lands Bills that "forced the colonial authorities to retreat".

In many ways, what the President did was to render his version of our recent political history about which there is little consensus, with many contested claims on both sides -especially between the United Party's (UP's) and the convention People's Party's (CPP's) versions of events.

While the speech was generally commendable in lauding the contributions of people as diverse as the musicologist Dr Ephraim Amu, Yaa Asantewaa and the formidable Dede Ashikisham, the President also seized the opportunity to condemn what he called the "infamous Preventive Detention Act of 1958" and celebrated many of the prominent politicians who were detained under it.

The Act, of course ,has been the subject of debate for years and the famous Supreme Court case- "RE:AKOTO AND 7 OTHERS"- on its legality and whether Parliament or the Constitution of Ghana alone was [then] sovereign and supreme crystallises the differing opinions on this part of our history perfectly. And it seems to me that opposing sides on this issue will remain irreconcilable for a long time. The President, however, has every right, particularly as a human rights lawyer, to state his position unequivocally on this issue and I respect him for that.

Victims of bombings
However, taken as whole, for a speech that was part a lesson in political history and part tribute to the many who played major les in our struggle for independence, the President left out key sections of our community who are more than dotted ellipses in that historical narrative. Specifically, there was no mention or tribute to the many innocent people who lost their lives through the very turbulent years of sustained bombings in the early 1960s. One doesn't have to apportion blame or take sides to acknowledge that these dastardly acts occurred. Here is a sampling of what the President left out of his version of our history.

In 1962, the ceremonial opening of Ghana's third Parliament in the new Republic which was scheduled for September 25 was postponed until October 2 because of a bomb explosion in the West End Arena of Accra on September 20 that injured 100 people.

According to the London Times "[ a] public meeting had been held in the West End Arena and the crowd set out in a torchlight procession led by Young Pioneers when after less than a mile, the bombs went off. Most of the casualties were members of the Young Pioneers." This explosion came right off the heels of an earlier bomb attempt on President Nkrumah's life on September 9 on Independence Avenue.

Kulungugu explosion
The Kulungungu explosion which occurred when a bomb grenade was thrown near President Nkrumah's car while on his way back from talks with President Maurice Yameogo in Upper Volta did not feature either. President Nkrumah himself escaped unhurt but four people were killed and 56 others, including members of the President's entourage, were injured. This bomb attempt so shook the world that Queen Elisabeth II and British Prime Minister Sir Harold Macmillan sent messages of  sympathy. The Queen's message read as follows: - "I was shocked to learn of the attempt on your life. My husband and I are greatly relieved that you are unharmed. Please convey an expression of our sincere sympathy to those who were injured." Yet, this cataclysmic event that shaped our political discourse and even led to the unprecedented sacking of then Chief Justice Arku Korsah did not get a mention in our current President's version of our history. One wonders: did Chief Justice Arku Korsah not get a mention because of 'Re: Akoto'?

It is also particularly notable because among the series of prosecutions brought by the Attorney-General for the Kulungugu bomb attack was one 'State v Otchere' heard by a Special Court constituted by Justice K.Arku Korsah, Chief Justice, Mr Justice W. B. Van Lare and Mr Justice E.Akufo Addo, both Justices of the Supreme Court of course, Justice E.Akufo-Addo was the father of our current President. And all three Justices found Robert Benjamin Otchere (a member of Parliament for the United Party) "guilty on both counts of conspiracy to commit treason and treason and convict[ed] him accordingly." The Justices (including the current President's father) also concluded that   Joseph Yaw Manu, the second accused, also a member of the United Party "bears full responsibility for all the acts of the said Obetsebi Lamptey [celebrated by the current President] and therefore for the Kulungugu incident, and we therefore, find him guilty on both counts of (a) conspiracy to commit treason and (b) treason, and we convict him accordingly".

But neither this nor the victims of Kulungugu were acknowledged in our current President's version of our political history.

These atrocities were preceded by explosions much earlier, and prior to the visit of the Queen of England to Ghana. On November 6,1961, a bomb explosion went off near the national lottery building in Accra. While no damage was done to property and no persons were injured, the police took away and detonated other timed devices found at the location. According to reports, three hours later, "a second bomb went off near big roadside hoarding carrying coloured pictures of the Queen and Nkrumah".All that occurred while the British Foreign Secretary Duncan Sandys was on a reconnaissance visit to Accra to assess possible security risks with the Queen's visit. To assure Her Majesty's safety, Sandys undertook a personal tour of Accra and at one point even got out of his car at Black Star Square to examine the damage to the Independence Arch from an earlier explosion on Saturday, November 4.

Things got so unstable and frightening that the British government threatened to cancel the ate visit by the Queen. In a' statement to the House of Commons in London, Foreign Secretary Duncan Sandys assured British Members of Parliament that, "If it should appear to us [the British government] that the visit would involve abnormal risks, we would not hesitate to advise cancellation." Earlier, the British government and Yard officers to Accra to examine security arrangements to ensure it was safe for Her Majesty to travel.

Pretence and trials
The Queen's visit passed without incident but the bomb explosions did not cease after she left or the Kulungugu trials. On January 9,1963, another bomb explosion claimed the lives of four people and injured 85 in Accra. By then, such bomb explosions had killed 21 people and injured 400 citizens of our newly independent country. These faceless and nameless victims, almost all of whom were neither politicians nor activists, did not get a mention in President's roll of honour nor were they acknowledged even simply, as innocent victims of the struggle.

I had hoped that given his radical youth and his father's involvement in the trials of the bomb atrocities that blighted our politics and nation in the 1960s, that the President would be more balanced in his historical narrative. Alas, I was wrong.
The speech pretended to be all-inclusive, but it was sadly a partial history of our country, with a personal point of view- the President's.

Sixty years on, one would think pretence, denials and obfuscations would be a thing of the past and we would be mature and grown-up enough to admit all our faults. The President's speech, however, demonstrates that we are not yet ready for an open and honest conversation about our past. We will remain divided until we get a President who is committed to healing our nation and embracing all our stories.

So here is to all the victims of the bomb explosions of the 1960s who were left out of our President's address on March 6, 2017. Your sacrifices, though not offered voluntarily, have not gone unnoticed. One day, you too will get your deserved memorial.
Credit: Daily Graphic

Editorial
THE DEBATE
The debate about Ghana’s history instigated by President Nana Addo Dankwa  Akufo-Addo in his speech on the 60th anniversary of Ghana’s Independence is raging like wild fire and we earnestly hope that it would not lead to a deeper polarisation of the Ghanaian society.

We have joined this heroic duty only as a means of clarifying our history with a view to shaping today and moving forward into a tomorrow of hope for the working people of Ghana.

Today, we are republishing an article by Ekow Nelson which was originally carried by the “Daily Graphic’ which shows the extent to which the Nkrumah government was subverted by anti-national forces which had group themselves into a so-called National Liberation Movement (NLM).

This violent opposition to Nkrumah caused hundreds of deaths of innocent children, women, and the innocent.

It is the reckless actions of these violent tribalists which compelled the Nkrumah Government to pass the Preventive Detention Act to save the lives and properties of innocent Ghanaians.

It is our hope that as we debate our history, we will pledge to never return to the days of irresponsible opposition.  

Vanderpuije Not Happy With Game Centres
Tsentse, Alfred Oko Vanderpuije
Dr Alfred Oko Vanderpuije, the Ablekuma South Member of Parliament has warned game centres operating in the constituency to adhere to the laws barring children under age to patronise their facilities or face closure.

He said one of the areas of critical concern was the protection of the rights of the child and the provision of their social amenities and support against harmful practices, hence the need for the game centres not to admit them to jeopardise their future.

Dr Vanderpuije gave the warning when Heads of Basic Schools in the constituency paid a courtesy call on him at his office in Accra.

He said children were venerable and therefore needed protection, support and guidance to save them against any negative acts.

He said it was important for every parent or community to give due attention to the education of their children, who would be the future leaders of the country.

The MP said the primary responsibility of ensuring quality teaching and learning was to ensure greater accountability between the teachers and their students to create a friendly environment that would encourage the children to learn hard in their academic work.

Dr Vanderpuije said he would continue to collaborate with the Accra Metropolitan Assembly to put up more of the Millennium School buildings in the constituency.

He said motivating teachers was key to improving quality, accessibility and relevance of education, adding that; “I can assure you that teachers will be motivated to enable them to play their roles effectively towards attainment of this goal.”

“There is the need for academic achievement now,” and therefore every teacher should exhibit greater consciousness, commitment and sacrifice to efficiently teach his or her children,” he said.

Dr Vanderpuije said he had instituted an award ceremony for 2017 best three schools in the constituency and to make it more competitive and urged the teachers to avoid absenteeism.
He called on parents to get involved in bringing their children up to be responsible citizens by constantly liaising with the teachers to bring about quality education.

Mr John Wilson Adjololo, the Head-teacher of the Korle Gonno Roman Catholic Boys’ School, and the spokesperson for the teachers, expressed concern about the children patronising the game centres in the area and called on the MP to check their activities.

He was grateful to the MP for his support to the area and hoped that he would not hesitate to source further help for the schools in the constituency.
GNA

International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation
Statement by UN Women on the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, 6 February 2017.
While there has been an overall decline in the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) across countries, this progress is likely to be offset by rapid population growth in countries where FGM occurs, unless efforts to eliminate the practice are renewed in light of recent research, and urgently stepped up.

A 2016 report of the UN Secretary-General shows the single largest factor influencing the continuation of female genital mutilation to be the desire for social acceptance and avoidance of social stigma. The social norms, customs and values that condone
 FGM are multi-faceted, vary across countries and even between communities, and can change over time. This presents a powerful and complex challenge for all those engaged in the effort to end FGM.  

The importance of education to address negative social norms has been demonstrated in Egypt, where the reduction in the risk of girls undergoing FGM has been linked both to the educational attainment of their mothers, as well as of other women in their communities.

We have witnessed how the powerful personal testimony and advocacy of activists such as Jaha Dukureh in The Gambia can bring increased understanding of the issues to local communities and amplify the voices of a growing movement calling upon leaders to put an end to this practice.  

Further research needed
The collection and analysis of data is crucial to better tailor our interventions in light of the specific factors associated with the practice globally.  Further research is needed in areas outside Africa, as FGM is also prevalent in Latin America, South-East Asia and areas of the Middle East, as well as now being present in the United States and United Kingdom. We must pay greater attention to the risks associated with migration and the greater movement between borders. Women and girls are still extremely vulnerable, even in countries which are not traditionally associated with the practice of FGM, if families on the move maintain the practice. 

Increasing numbers of countries have extraterritorial legislation for their citizens practising female genital mutilations in other jurisdictions, and hold those who practice to account. In The Gambia, the adoption of legislation has created an enabling environment for the Gambia Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children to support those who have carried out FGM to acquire skills to find alternative livelihoods. It has also empowered women to take an active role in protecting other women and girls and increased community awareness of FGM's harmful impacts. 

Need to complement legal structures
Legal structures, however, are only part of the solution; they must be complemented by multiple prevention strategies, for example mobilizing communities, and influencing social norm change, and engaging those who can bring about those changes, such as men and boys, civil society and faith-based leaders. In Somalia, the Y-PEER network has helped mobilize young people, including young men to discuss sensitive issues, such as female genital mutilation. 

FGM is inextricably linked with other forms of gender inequality, such as violence against women and girls, and other harmful practices such as child, early and forced marriages. To accelerate progress towards ending FGM, we are working with governments, local administrations and civil society partners to address the root causes that perpetuate unequal power relations between women and men, and also with sister agencies, such as UNICEF and UNFPA, on their long-standing campaigns. Together, we must keep this issue at the
 forefront of the human rights agenda.

KNUST leads effort to increase aquaculture and vegetable production
By Kwabia Owusu-Mensah/Florence Afriyie Mensah
The Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) is leading the nation’s effort to increase vegetable and fish production through the introduction of an integrated aquaculture system.

Under this, nutrient-rich pond water and sediment would be used for fish culture and vegetable production.

A 2015 research report of the university made available to the Ghana News Agency (GNA) said this would not only ensure efficient use of water, nutrients and other resources but also reduce pollution of natural water bodies for continuous fish production even in the dry season.  

It indicated that the Department of Fisheries and Watershed Management of the University “is rolling out a tilapia-hatchery-vegetable aquaponics system”, under which nutrient-rich effluent water from tilapia tanks would be utilized to grow vegetables and the clean water returned to the fish tanks - to promote climate smart agriculture.

“To enhance uptake, the Department has trained farmers in stocking practices, best management practices, farm management and farm budgeting in fish culture.” 
It has additionally identified local feed ingredients to boost tilapia production.

The report said studies were also underway to formulate tilapia feed, using local ingredients to bring down the cost of commercial feed.

The Department has again located markets for various sizes of tilapia and promoting their production in ponds to meet both domestic and commercial demands.

The increased knowledge of the market demand for various sizes of fish among farmers, it noted, had raised the production of tilapia and catfish in Ashanti, Brong-Ahafo, Eastern and the Western Regions.

As part of strategy to increase public awareness and education on fish farming, the report announced the setting up of a Friday market at the premises of the Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources.

The aim is not only to market the various sizes of tilapia and other fish stocks, but to also improve direct engagement with the general public.

The people would have the opportunity to acquire knowledge of fish production, pond and feed management, while engendering confidence in those eager to venture into aquaculture business.
GNA  

              South Africa proposes sinister new Afrophobic laws
A group of protesters trying to displace immigrants were confronted by police as they attempted to enter a predominantly Somali neighbourhood in Pretoria West. Police separated the groups and released stun grenades and tear gas to disperse the crowds. Photo: Groundup
Government’s proposals to clampdown on immigration and a recent disgraceful xenophobic march against African and Asian nationals living in South Africa reveals a society from top to bottom, across the political spectrum, confused and at odds with the values embraced by its Constitution.

The morning of the xenophobic march, a caller into a radio show of the national public broadcaster said, “It’s not the Pakistanis and the Somalis, but the Nigerians who are the criminals.” Such absurd views and national stereotyping are not new. The radio presenter dutifully read out deeply prejudiced SMSs, which listeners had sent in, without any comment on their stupidity.

Outrageous notions persist with depressing frequency: the Somalis cheat local businesses, the Zimbabweans steal jobs, the Chinese are smugglers, the Indians are crooks, the Nigerians are scammers, and local South Africans are dead beats, who prefer to live on social grants rather than lift a finger to help themselves.

Before the march a pamphlet circulated saying Nigerians and Zimbabweans ‘hijack our buildings, sell drugs, inject young South African ladies with drugs and sell them as prostitutes’. A march against an undeniable crime problem in the inner city is one thing, but a march against foreign nationals is utterly unacceptable.

Such prejudice against nationals of certain foreign states can be found among the rich and the poor; from civil society organisations such as the Mamelodi Concerned Residents (who convened the march) to city officials; from politicians on the left and centre to the far right; from nurses and teachers to the police. Police regularly extort bribes, victimise or fail to protect foreign nationals.

South African President Jacob Zuma
Recently, a circular was distributed by a primary school saying: ‘If any foreign child arrives here on Monday we will phone the police to come and collect your child and you can collect your child at the police station’. It said the instructions came after meeting Home Affairs officials. After a public outcry, it was withdrawn.

To mark his first hundred days in office, newly elected DA Mayor of Johannesburg Herman Mashaba said he was “declaring war against illegality”, by which he meant the 115,000 undocumented, mostly African, immigrants he alleges occupy the inner city and are getting in the way of a business opportunity for property developers. So much for the man who founded the hair product line Black Like Me.

In the following weeks, Mashaba was pleading for peace and condemning xenophobia. But the dog whistle had been heard.

On a wing and prayer, South Africa has not seen the same scale of displacement, murder and mayhem it saw during the spate of violence characterised by Afrophobia of 2008. However, the country is on a knife edge. Any politician using the word “war”, while promising mass evictions and blaming immigrants for government’s failure to police crime and steward the economy is courting disaster.

Violence against immigrants has never stopped; it continually simmers with devastating consequences for innocent people caught in the middle. Eleven Somali nationals were killed in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, in the past month alone, including three shopkeepers who were gunned down on the same day at different locations according to police. The instances of violence against African immigrants in this new year countrywide are too many to enumerate here.

Officially, on paper and under the Constitution, South Africa has one of the best and most advanced approaches to immigration, allowing immigrants to settle freely wherever they choose and enjoy full and equal protection under the bill of rights. This is a humane, practical and sensible approach.

But on the ground, African and Asian immigrants face institutionalised bureaucratic harm, with numerous policy decisions and administrative actions being taken, such as closing access to processing centres, that almost seem designed to turn perfectly law-abiding foreign nationals into undocumented and therefore “illegal” immigrants. The immigration process is so opaque, most opt for asylum.

By not allowing people to work, study, become documented and assimilate, government creates the very conditions for which it then proceeds to blame foreign nationals.
Immigrants locked themselves in a home as the violence spread. Photo: Groundup

There are now thousands of Malawians and Zimbabweans detained and living in the most appalling conditions in South African prisons.

Of course, there are also instances where South Africans have protected, helped or gone to the rescue of foreign nationals and where people co-exist quite happily. But politicians exploit prejudice. Lip service is paid to African solidarity, but it is clear that both the ANC and the DA want to clamp down on immigration in the erroneous belief that this will somehow relieve social pressures. It will not. Only the economy and a less corrupt government can do that. Wiping out a class of entrepreneurs and sorely needed skills will do more harm than good to South Africa’s failing economic engine.

A new green paper (a discussion document drafted by a Ministry and the first step to making new laws) from the Department of Home Affairs is extremely sinister, and so is the proposal for a new Border Management Authority.

Under the proposals, asylum seekers will lose their rights and will be prevented from living normally while their cases are being assessed.

Most alarmingly, processing centres are to built on the border, with the South African government seemingly not having learned a thing from the disastrous examples of the European Union, Turkey and Australia.

This is the South African version of Trump’s wall. It won’t work. It will create centres of misery and abuse. It will have a terrible effect on the areas where these places are created. It will harm South Africa’s international image and it will cost a fortune down the line.
It will be interesting to see who gets the contracts in the US to build Trump’s Mexico wall and administer it. Soon it will be time to start asking, the same questions, closer to home.

A hidden continent Found
Earth has a concealed continent called ‘Zealandia’ hidden in the Pacific Ocean and attached to New Zealand, according to newly published research.

A team of 11 researchers found that New Zealand and New Caledonia are actually part of a huge 4.9 million sq km (1.89 million square-mile) single slab of continental crust that is separate from Australia.

The study, published by the Geological Society of America, found that the region is 94 percent submerged, mostly as a result of crustal thinning before the supercontinental break-up, using upgraded satellite-based elevation and gravity map technology.
"The scientific value of classifying Zealandia as a continent is much more than just an extra name on a list," the scientists wrote. "That a continent can be so submerged yet unfragmented makes it a useful and thought-provoking geodynamic end member in exploring the cohesion and breakup of continental crust."

The team says it should be considered a geological continent, rather than the previously-held theory that it was a collection of continental islands and fragments.
Based on various lines of geological and geophysical evidence, particularly those accumulated in the last two decades, we argue that Zealandia is not a collection of partly submerged continental fragments but is a coherent 4.9 Mkm2 continent,” the study concludes.

As geologists count Europe and Asia as one giant continent called ‘Eurasia’, the new addition of Zealandia brings the total number of official geologic continents to seven.© Zealandia’s crust thickness typically ranges from 10 to 30km (six to 19 miles) and is roughly the size of India. It’s believed to have broken off from Antarctica about 100 million years ago, and then again from Australia about 80 million years ago.

Researchers behind the study are calling Zealandia a “realisation” rather than a “discovery”, as New Zealand has been considered a continent in its own right by some experts in the field for years.

"This is not a sudden discovery but a gradual realisation; as recently as 10 years ago we would not have had the accumulated data or confidence in interpretation to write this paper," the study’s authors wrote.
Zealandia illustrates that the large and the obvious in natural science can be overlooked.”

James Baldwin (1924-87) on American “innocence”
James Baldwin

By Prakash Kona
In their blind rejection of tragedy, in their fear of that dreadful genre that tells us the truth of our failures as individuals and as a people, in that lack of knowledge that our public lives are doomed to destruction because our private lives are warped, Americans have condemned themselves to an unforgivable innocence. Nowhere is this innocence more clearly revealed than in their foreign policy in the third world.

"No society can smash the social contract and be exempt from the consequences, and the consequences are chaos for everybody in the society."

“I never met a people more infantile in my life”, the black American writer James Baldwin observed of Americans while speaking to Richard Goldstein in 1984. He would certainly have been amused with Donald Trump who embodies the infantilism of an entire nation at its most sophisticated.

Innocence is one word that Baldwin uses in a way that combines pity with disgust. It is not the Christian child-like innocence that is a passport to the kingdom of heaven. It is termed innocence because of a refusal to grow; an innocence trapped in an unwillingness to take responsibility for one’s actions; a dangerous kind of innocence because it devastates the lives of others with absolute conviction in its own righteousness; an innocence incapable of coming to terms with reality. It is the innocence with which David will betray himself in the process of betraying those who love him in the novel Giovanni’s Room. It is the innocence of someone who cannot have a personal life because they are incapable of being committed to themselves as persons.

‘Infantilism’ is the word that is a synonym to this kind of innocence because it prefers to see the past as utopia rather than as history. Interestingly, as a nation America celebrates that kind of innocence which is reflected in popular culture especially cinema and music. It is a culture that has no place for tragedy unless couched in consumerist fantasies of a life forever. If, according to Baldwin, “white Americans do not believe in death” it is because they have rejected tragedy. As Baldwin notes in The Fire Next Time, “Life is tragic simply because the earth turns and the sun inexorably rises and sets, and one day, for each of us, the sun will go down for the last, last time.”

I don’t think Donald Trump is aware of that sun which is going down for the last time. I don’t think Obama was aware of the essential tragedy that lies in being caught within a temporality that limits all human power. The same goes for Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. Yet, every post-war President of the US shares in that terrible innocence that is at the heart of what being an American is all about.

In their blind rejection of tragedy, in their fear of that dreadful genre that tells us the truth of our failures as individuals and as a people, in that lack of knowledge that our public lives are doomed to destruction because our private lives are warped, Americans have condemned themselves to an unforgivable innocence. Nowhere is this innocence more clearly revealed than in their foreign policy in the third world. In no uncertain terms, Baldwin makes the point toward the end of his last interview with Quincy Troupe, “It’s the only hope the world has, that the notion of Western hegemony and civilization be contained.” In sustaining the hegemony of powerful global elites who serve as engine for corporate capitalism America is guilty of keeping alive the notion of a civilization obsessed with its own sense of racial, moral and political superiority.

A culture or civilization must have a notion of mortality in order to come out of the morbid state of innocence. Power, fame and wealth thrive as ideals to be achieved where people have an illusion of permanence. In the epic Mahabharata the demi-god Yaksha asked King Yudhishthira, “What is the greatest wonder on earth?” The just king replied with perfect equanimity: “We see death all around us; yet, we think that our life on earth is permanent.” Not only is it a response that would have pleased Baldwin immensely, but something he himself would have given if the Yaksha would pose him such a seemingly strange question.

While refusing to see himself as a “spokesman” Baldwin insists on viewing himself as a “witness.” “A spokesman assumes that he is speaking for others.” This does not happen with the one who bears “witness to the truth.” The truth for Baldwin is that America as a nation is trapped in its own innocence, in its own language and in its own false image of itself as a leader and liberator of the world. Though this to a large extent is reflected in its race relations it is true of everything else as well such as politics and sexuality.

When asked if there was a “particularly American component of homophobia,” Baldwin responded, “Americans are terrified of feeling anything. And homophobia is simply an extreme example of the American terror that’s concerned with growing up.” Where race, sexuality and politics will meet is the point of realization that if you cannot mature in your understanding of one of them, you are not going to mature in the others as well. Thus, racism will only be the other face of homophobia – and both, are rooted in the same “terror of the flesh” that underlies a foreign policy wherein weapons are sold to the ruling classes of the third world and reactionary nations such as Saudi Arabia and Israel enjoy the diplomatic and military support of the United States.

The innocence which in fact is fear to “experience” life is in fact a deep-rooted fear of knowing the other person. It is a fear that disturbs because it tells us the truth about ourselves. It is only through the truth that one could ever come out of the self-imposed innocence. Talking of Norman Mailer, whose “gifts” he admires and is “fond” of as a person, Baldwin notes that, “he's a perfect example of what it means to be a white writer in this century, a white American writer in this country. It affords too many opportunities to avoid reality.”

The discovery of the truth about oneself is impossible where one does not deal with the reality that takes the shape of another person, and not an imaginary figure constructed by television, film-makers and politicians.

This terror of the other person is a terror of being spoken back to and described in terms that we do not like to hear. The “real terror that engulfs the white world,” according to Baldwin is, “the terror of being described by those they've been describing for so long.” The alternative to the terror of facing the truth as is revealed through the mouth of another person is of course a death-like innocence coming out of a terror of living.

* Prakash Kona is a writer, teacher, researcher and Professor of English Literature at The English and Foreign Languages University (EFLU), Hyderabad, India. He is the author of Conjurer of Nights [poetry: 2012, Waterloo Press, Hove, UK]; Nunc Stans [Creative Non-fiction: 2009, Crossing Chaos enigmatic ink, Ontario, Canada], Pearls of an Unstrung Necklace [Fiction: 2005, Fugue State Press, New York] and Streets that Smell of Dying Roses [Experimental Fiction: 2003, Fugue State Press, New York]. His research interests broadly include women’s studies, film studies and Third World politics and writing.
Source: Pambazuka









No comments:

Post a Comment